Re: [qubes-users] Re: A worrisome threat? Kinda...

2017-08-30 Thread Alex
On 08/30/2017 05:53 PM, Dominique St-Pierre Boucher wrote: > On Wednesday, August 30, 2017 at 11:32:05 AM UTC-4, Alex wrote: >> There's no isolation benefit with a software firewall if the >> remote administration packets are received by the local network >> adapter, since the "zombie RAT fungus"

Re: [qubes-users] Re: A worrisome threat? Kinda...

2017-08-30 Thread Dominique St-Pierre Boucher
On Wednesday, August 30, 2017 at 11:32:05 AM UTC-4, Alex wrote: > On 08/30/2017 05:17 PM, wordswithn...@gmail.com wrote: > >> Please also note that any remote administration command can only > >> be received through networking, so proper firewalling (ipv6 may > >> complicate things - prepare your

Re: [qubes-users] Re: A worrisome threat? Kinda...

2017-08-30 Thread Alex
On 08/30/2017 05:17 PM, wordswithn...@gmail.com wrote: >> Please also note that any remote administration command can only >> be received through networking, so proper firewalling (ipv6 may >> complicate things - prepare your studies in advance) and monitoring >> may help great lengths. Also, do

Re: [qubes-users] Re: A worrisome threat? Kinda...

2017-08-29 Thread Alex
On 08/29/2017 11:02 PM, Sandy Harris wrote: > As I probably should have known, Qubes developers are already well > aware of this. See for example: > https://blog.invisiblethings.org/papers/2015/x86_harmful.pdf Exactly. To give a little more context: * Intel ME is a totally independent, totally

[qubes-users] Re: A worrisome threat?

2017-08-29 Thread Sandy Harris
As I probably should have known, Qubes developers are already well aware of this. See for example: https://blog.invisiblethings.org/papers/2015/x86_harmful.pdf -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and