Re: [qubes-users] Q4.0 - LVM Thin Pool volumes - lsblk returns very large (256kb) MIN-IO and DISC-GRAN values

On 5/24/19 10:00 PM, brendan.h...@gmail.com wrote: Hi folks, Summary/Questions: 1. Is the extremely large minimum-IO value of 256KB for the dom0 block devices representing Q4 VM volume in the thin pool ... intentional? 2. And if so, to what purpose (e.g. performance, etc.)? 3. And if so, has

[qubes-users] Re: qubes-template-debian-10

четверг, 23 мая 2019 г., 20:52:08 UTC+3 пользователь Dominique St-Pierre Boucher написал: > Good day qubes-users, > > Do you know when a debian 10 template will be available? > > Tried to do the manual upgrade and keep running into issues. > > Thanks > > Dominique you can use debian 11

Re: [qubes-users] AEM pcr sanity check failed

On 5/26/19 2:32 AM, Patrik Hagara wrote: > as the one in Fedora repos is quite > ancient with multiple - even security - bugs Actually, scratch that. You can get an up-to-date Fedora tboot package (newer than Ubuntu!) from a more recent release [1], manually verify the signatures [2] and install

Re: [qubes-users] Q4.0 - LVM Thin Pool volumes - lsblk returns very large (256kb) MIN-IO and DISC-GRAN values

On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 08:03:22PM -0700, brendan.h...@gmail.com wrote: > Looks like the chunksize of the pool is the controlling factor (256kb) here. > > % lvs -o name,chunksize|grep pool > > Docs say the default value is 64kb (that’s also the minimum for a thin pool). > Not sure why qubesos

Re: [qubes-users] WARNING: don't update qubes, will break your install

I did a full backup a week ago. I think I'll do another fresh install, then restore it to last week. I lost a week's worth of work. That's what I get for slacking on backups. I'll have to hold off on ANY updates, until I hear something on this issue. -- You received this message because you

Re: [qubes-users] Q4.0 - LVM Thin Pool volumes - lsblk returns very large (256kb) MIN-IO and DISC-GRAN values

On 5/25/19 12:45 PM, Brendan Hoar wrote: On Sat, May 25, 2019 at 12:09 PM Chris Laprise > wrote: It would be interesting if thin-lvm min transfer were the reason for this difference in behavior between fstrim and the filesystem. Indeed. Pretty sure that is

Re: [qubes-users] AEM pcr sanity check failed

On 5/22/19 1:56 PM, m...@peterihasz.com wrote: > I renamed the sinit module to the right one. I think it is loaded but the > system continously reboots. > Here are the logs: > https://photos.app.goo.gl/MtYNRYf8uduy1Ukn8 Try appending "min_ram=0x200" [1] to tboot params. If it's still stuck

Re: [qubes-users] WARNING: don't update qubes, will break your install

I just noticed on the Fedora forums they released Fedora 30 today. Qubes runs Fedora 29, so I don't know if today's updates had anything to do with f30, but it might be related. Checking to see if anyone else on fedora forums has similar issue as mine. -- You received this message because

Re: [qubes-users] Q4.0 - LVM Thin Pool volumes - lsblk returns very large (256kb) MIN-IO and DISC-GRAN values

On Sat, May 25, 2019 at 12:09 PM Chris Laprise wrote: > > It would be interesting if thin-lvm min transfer were the reason for > this difference in behavior between fstrim and the filesystem. Indeed. Pretty sure that is the case for some workloads. However, I think you're wrong to assume that

Re: [qubes-users] WARNING: don't update qubes, will break your install

On Saturday, May 25, 2019 at 6:05:29 PM UTC-7, unman wrote: > On Sat, May 25, 2019 at 01:55:43PM -0700, drok...@gmail.com wrote: > > I just finished a fresh install of Qubes, then updated dom0, fedora > > template, debian template, whonix gw and ws templates, as per instructions > > on > > > >

[qubes-users] Qubes Server Formulas

Dear Qubes community, Just to inform you that I'm currently working on Qubes Server Formulas (Salt) for providing examples of server configurations. It intends to provide sufficient built-in Qubes materials for bringing Qubes to the edge of server environments. You can track this work here:

[qubes-users] WARNING: don't update qubes, will break your install

I just finished a fresh install of Qubes, then updated dom0, fedora template, debian template, whonix gw and ws templates, as per instructions on https://www.qubes-os.org/doc/installation-guide/ Shutdown, boot. Qubes won't let me login. Same problem as in my other post. -- You received this

Re: [qubes-users] WARNING: don't update qubes, will break your install

Yes, that worked. I'm back to a fresh install. I didn't know we could do that. Damn, I was a little hasty formatting my drive. That's okay, I didn't lose much. If I try upgrading again, it will break again. Maybe whatever fedora broke will get fixed in the coming weeks. I don't like the

[qubes-users] Re: [qubes-devel] Qubes Server Formulas

Yeah! Let's go server!! QubesOS rules the world! Le sam. 25 mai 2019 à 19:21, Frédéric Pierret a écrit : > Dear Qubes community, > > Just to inform you that I'm currently working on Qubes Server Formulas > (Salt) for providing examples of server configurations. It intends to > provide

Re: [qubes-users] WARNING: don't update qubes, will break your install

On Sat, May 25, 2019 at 06:22:11PM -0700, d wrote: > On Saturday, May 25, 2019 at 6:05:29 PM UTC-7, unman wrote: > > On Sat, May 25, 2019 at 01:55:43PM -0700, drok...@gmail.com wrote: > > > I just finished a fresh install of Qubes, then updated dom0, fedora > > > template, debian template, whonix

Re: [qubes-users] Q4.0 - LVM Thin Pool volumes - lsblk returns very large (256kb) MIN-IO and DISC-GRAN values

Brendan Hoar wrote on 5/25/19 4:45 PM: On Sat, May 25, 2019 at 12:09 PM Chris Laprise wrote: I’m going to add an Issue/Feature request to add metadata store monitoring and alerts to the disk space widget. :) I had the same thought reading Chris' email. -- You received this message because

Re: [qubes-users] X230 vs Purism - real world attack probability

On 05/21/2019 09:52 AM, scurge1tl wrote: > I have a question related to the decision about what laptop is the > better option for Qubes usage, from the security point of view, in the > real world. > > The question is related to the IME on Intel, PSP on AMD and other > Hardware holes. I took these

Re: [qubes-users] WARNING: don't update qubes, will break your install

On Sat, May 25, 2019 at 01:55:43PM -0700, drok...@gmail.com wrote: > I just finished a fresh install of Qubes, then updated dom0, fedora template, > debian template, whonix gw and ws templates, as per instructions on > > https://www.qubes-os.org/doc/installation-guide/ > > Shutdown, boot. > >

[qubes-users] qubes updater broken? just had to re-install qubes

Don't know if anyone else had this problem yet today. Booted my computer this morning, Qubes 4 fully updated, been using for months, apply updates every day. Today, I noticed lots of updates. Dom0 had both kernel and Xen updates, so did all the other qubes. I let the normal Qubes Updater do

Re: [qubes-users] Re: qubes-template-debian-10

On Sat, May 25, 2019 at 12:02:18AM -0700, faggot shitty wrote: > четверг, 23 мая 2019 г., 20:52:08 UTC+3 пользователь Dominique St-Pierre > Boucher написал: > > Good day qubes-users, > > > > Do you know when a debian 10 template will be available? > > > > Tried to do the manual upgrade and keep

[qubes-users] qubes backup and restore question

What is the point of backing up a qube, if you can't restore to it? I'm restoring a full backup, and instead of restoring to qubes, it's creating new ones with different names. WTF! What the hell am I supposed to do now? Delete the original qubes, and rename the restores? I'm guessing that