799:
> What would be the better choice regarding attack surface:
> disposable netvm+firewallvm vs. mirage-firewall?
You still need a netvm with Mirage, but smallest attack surface alone is
disposable netvm + Mirage. "Disposable" doesn't increase or decrease
attack surface, though. It helps
My current box does not have m.2 slots but I plan on upgrading my box in
the next year or so. Thing is, I need more space and some additional
speed would be nice.
I did not want to by a 2.5 sata3 drive when I will be upgrading.
With that said, I was looking at PCIe/m.2 adapter cards like
Sorry - I don't use Google Groups enough, so I just hit "Post Reply"
assuming that it would be smart enough to put the reply in the right place.
I looked at the XFCE keyboard shortcuts and window manager keyboard
shortcuts, and Ctrl-Alt-c/v aren't in use. There might be another place to
look,
Great! Thanks! That was what I missed.
Den lördag 10 augusti 2019 kl. 08:02:33 UTC+2 skrev awokd:
>
> jagr...@gmail.com :
> >
> > I made a backup of a debian based stand-alone qube. When I restore it,
> the
> > name of the qube shows up in the Desktop Manager's menu but with only
> two
> >
Hello,
Jon deps schrieb am Mi., 3. Juli 2019, 22:30:
> am curious if anyone actually does this , and how or would it make any
> sense instead to use a static sys-firewall , if I
> just have the default sys-firewall (which might be easier because
> there would not be a need for the PCI setup
jagro...@gmail.com:
I made a backup of a debian based stand-alone qube. When I restore it, the
name of the qube shows up in the Desktop Manager's menu but with only two
visible shortcuts: Start and Qubes settings. What have I missed?
Try Qubes Settings/Applications/Refresh.
--
You received
On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 10:48 PM Chris Laprise wrote:
> On 8/9/19 9:12 PM, 'awokd' via qubes-users wrote:
> > unman:
> >> On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 12:45:00AM +, 'awokd' via qubes-users wrote:
> >>> Chris Laprise:
> I'm currently unable to print from Qubes using either fedora-30,
>
