Unman wrote:
> (You can configure the mime and default associations to use
> qvm-open-in-dvm, so you can double click on a file and it will
> automatically open disposableVM and display it there.) If you ensure the
> disposableVM is spawned offline there is (almost) no chance of data being
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 2017-03-13 16:00, Unman wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 11:50:59AM -0700, hib0...@gmail.com wrote:
Four, I am aware of disposable VMs but for a working desktop
these are of marginal use outside experimentation, malware
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 2017-03-13 10:37, Unman wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 08:13:31AM -0700, hib0...@gmail.com wrote:
>> I only skimmed the thread so I apologize for my laziness up
>> front if I missed something but I think a few clarifications need
>> to be made
On Monday, March 13, 2017 at 5:00:22 PM UTC-6, Unman wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 11:50:59AM -0700, hib...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Four, I am aware of disposable VMs but for a working desktop these are
> > > > of marginal use outside experimentation, malware testing, untrusted web
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 11:50:59AM -0700, hib0...@gmail.com wrote:
> > >
> > > Four, I am aware of disposable VMs but for a working desktop these are of
> > > marginal use outside experimentation, malware testing, untrusted web
> > > browsing, etc. They are not practical for a work environment
On Monday, March 13, 2017 at 1:37:04 PM UTC-4, Unman wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 08:13:31AM -0700, @gmail.com wrote:
> > The main purpose of this or any security system is to mitigate risk. I
> > suspect we all agree on this?
> >
> > One advantage of having sudo restricted is it reduces the
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 08:13:31AM -0700, hib0...@gmail.com wrote:
> The main purpose of this or any security system is to mitigate risk. I
> suspect we all agree on this?
>
> One advantage of having sudo restricted is it reduces the attack foot print
> to installing a root level compromise on
On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 01:10:32PM -0800, Daniel Moerner wrote:
> On Friday, March 10, 2017 at 9:55:08 PM UTC-5, Unman wrote:
> > So yes, in a very real sense, it doesn't matter
> > to me if the qube where I collect mail, (which isn't the qube where I
> > read it) is compromised in some way.
>
>
On Friday, March 10, 2017 at 9:55:08 PM UTC-5, Unman wrote:
> So yes, in a very real sense, it doesn't matter
> to me if the qube where I collect mail, (which isn't the qube where I
> read it) is compromised in some way.
Hi Unman,
Could you explain your setup for collecting mail in one Qube and
