Re: [qubes-users] Why is dom0 so long behind in versions?

2022-01-19 Thread 'Rune Philosof' via qubes-users
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 5:49 PM Floyd wrote: > On 1/18/22 7:09 AM, 'Rune Philosof' via qubes-users wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 1:24 PM 'awokd' via qubes-users < > qubes-users@googlegroups.com> wrote: > >> 'Rune Philosof' via qubes-users: >> > Why not use fedora 35 for dom0? >> > Wouldn't

Re: [qubes-users] Why is dom0 so long behind in versions?

2022-01-18 Thread unman
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 02:09:30PM +0100, 'Rune Philosof' via qubes-users wrote: > On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 1:24 PM 'awokd' via qubes-users < > qubes-users@googlegroups.com> wrote: > > > 'Rune Philosof' via qubes-users: > > > Why not use fedora 35 for dom0? > > > Wouldn't it make it easier to

Re: [qubes-users] Why is dom0 so long behind in versions?

2022-01-18 Thread 'Rune Philosof' via qubes-users
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 1:24 PM 'awokd' via qubes-users < qubes-users@googlegroups.com> wrote: > 'Rune Philosof' via qubes-users: > > Why not use fedora 35 for dom0? > > Wouldn't it make it easier to maintain, while also getting better > hardware > > support? > > >

Re: [qubes-users] Why is dom0 so long behind in versions?

2022-01-18 Thread 'awokd' via qubes-users
'Rune Philosof' via qubes-users: Why not use fedora 35 for dom0? Wouldn't it make it easier to maintain, while also getting better hardware support? https://www.qubes-os.org/faq/#why-is-dom0-so-old -- - don't top post Mailing list etiquette: - trim quoted reply to only relevant portions -