On Sat, 21 Feb 2015 18:44:54 + (UTC), William Unruh
un...@invalid.ca wrote:
Why should it not continue to poll it? It should be pruned as a bad
ticker by the ntpd algorihm, and thus not affect the clock discipline.
But that offset might be just a temporary abberation and that source
come back
Le 21 févr. 2015 à 08:37, David Taylor
david-tay...@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid a écrit :
Folks,
I'm looking at:
http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~mills/ntp/html/drivers/driver28.html
and wanting to be sure that I understand flag1 correctly. The situation is
starting a computer which
David Taylor wrote:
On 21/02/2015 07:04, William Unruh wrote:
[]
orphan mode is about a group of computers. Orphan Mode allows a group
of ntpd processes to automonously select a leader in the event that all
real time sources become unreachable (i.e. are inaccessible).
chrony's is that you can
On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 19:19:43 +, Roger
invalid@invalid.invalid wrote:
Terje made the suggestion about too few servers. DNS returns 4
IP addresses at a time. By having four lines ntpd could have 12
different IP addresses returned if it used all four lines.
Roger, repeat after me: 4 times 4
On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 23:56:46 GMT, Brian Inglis
brian.ing...@systematicsw.ab.ca wrote:
Add iburst preempt to the ends of your pool server lines to
improve startup and drop poorer sources.
I'm only making one change at a time. That will come later.
Using one pool line ntpd slowly increases the
On 21/02/2015 08:33, Mike Cook wrote:
[]
My aged understanding concurs with yours. Set flag 1. Maybe not your
desired behavior, but possibly that of the designer.
[]
Thanks, Mike. We are carrying out some tests, but it means leaving the
computer down for at least several hours, and
On 21 Feb 2015 07:54:50 GMT, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
It looks like you have created your own problem.
What problem are you talking about?
--
Roger
___
questions mailing list
questions@lists.ntp.org
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
On 21 Feb 2015 10:52:40 GMT, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
Roger invalid@invalid.invalid wrote:
On 21 Feb 2015 07:54:50 GMT, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
It looks like you have created your own problem.
What problem are you talking about?
Your problem to get enough good servers.
When did I
Roger wrote:
On 21 Feb 2015 10:52:40 GMT, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
Roger invalid@invalid.invalid wrote:
On 21 Feb 2015 07:54:50 GMT, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
It looks like you have created your own problem.
What problem are you talking about?
Your problem to get enough good
Roger writes:
Using one pool line ntpd slowly increases the number of servers
until it is happy but hasn't dropped any, not even an obviously
rogue one. As DNS only returns 4 IP addresses that is the
maximum it can start with and why it has to build up its
numbers.
Yes, that is because
Le 21 févr. 2015 à 10:00, Roger invalid@invalid.invalid a écrit :
On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 19:19:43 +, Roger
invalid@invalid.invalid wrote:
Terje made the suggestion about too few servers. DNS returns 4
IP addresses at a time. By having four lines ntpd could have 12
different IP
William Unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote:
On 2015-02-19, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
Miroslav Lichvar mlich...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 12:48:46PM +, Rob wrote:
I am still finding out what sensor is best to use, we do have a room
temperature sensor that has .1C resolution
David Taylor writes:
On 21/02/2015 07:04, William Unruh wrote:
[]
orphan mode is about a group of computers. Orphan Mode allows a group
of ntpd processes to automonously select a leader in the event that all
real time sources become unreachable (i.e. are inaccessible).
chrony's is that
Roger invalid@invalid.invalid wrote:
On 20 Feb 2015 19:29:44 GMT, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
Why not just:
pool pool.ntp.org
That should be enough.
I did have just one line pool uk.pool.ntp.org but the rogue
Did I write pool uk.pool.ntp.org? I don't think so...
No, you didn't. Did I
William Unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote:
On 2015-02-19, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
Miroslav Lichvar mlich...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:05:45AM +, Rob wrote:
We have systems in places that are not temperature controlled and then
chrony is much better. I am looking for
Roger invalid@invalid.invalid wrote:
On 21 Feb 2015 07:54:50 GMT, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
It looks like you have created your own problem.
What problem are you talking about?
Your problem to get enough good servers.
___
questions mailing list
On 2015-02-21 01:00, Rob wrote:
William Unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote:
On 2015-02-19, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
Miroslav Lichvar mlich...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:05:45AM +, Rob wrote:
We have systems in places that are not temperature controlled and then
chrony is
David Taylor writes:
Thanks, Mike. We are carrying out some tests, but it means leaving the
computer down for at least several hours, and we've been trying about 24
hours down so far, so progress isn't rapid! If flag1 allows
off-the-network operation after several days outage, that will
Roger invalid@invalid.invalid wrote:
On 21 Feb 2015 10:52:40 GMT, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
Roger invalid@invalid.invalid wrote:
On 21 Feb 2015 07:54:50 GMT, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
It looks like you have created your own problem.
What problem are you talking about?
Your problem
On 2015-02-21, David Taylor david-tay...@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid wrote:
On 21/02/2015 07:04, William Unruh wrote:
[]
orphan mode is about a group of computers. Orphan Mode allows a group
of ntpd processes to automonously select a leader in the event that all
real time sources become
Brian Inglis brian.ing...@systematicsw.ab.ca wrote:
On 2015-02-21 01:00, Rob wrote:
William Unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote:
On 2015-02-19, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
Miroslav Lichvar mlich...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:05:45AM +, Rob wrote:
We have systems in places
On 2015-02-21, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
William Unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote:
On 2015-02-19, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
Miroslav Lichvar mlich...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:05:45AM +, Rob wrote:
We have systems in places that are not temperature controlled and
On 2015-02-21, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
William Unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote:
On 2015-02-19, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
Miroslav Lichvar mlich...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 12:48:46PM +, Rob wrote:
I am still finding out what sensor is best to use, we do have a room
On 21/02/2015 11:40, Harlan Stenn wrote:
David Taylor writes:
Thanks, Mike. We are carrying out some tests, but it means leaving the
computer down for at least several hours, and we've been trying about 24
hours down so far, so progress isn't rapid! If flag1 allows
off-the-network operation
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 1:57 AM, William Unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote:
On 2015-02-21, Paul tik-...@bodosom.net wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 3:23 PM, William Unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote:
??? how do assume that the chrony docs do not tell the truth?
^ you
Okay, I'll assume
David Taylor writes:
On 21/02/2015 11:40, Harlan Stenn wrote:
David Taylor writes:
Thanks, Mike. We are carrying out some tests, but it means leaving the
computer down for at least several hours, and we've been trying about 24
hours down so far, so progress isn't rapid! If flag1 allows
On 21/02/2015 17:52, William Unruh wrote:
[]
It will do that too. The crucial item there is the only method of time
correction is manual entry which is different from ntpd and orphan
mode. I have no idea why this conversation is continuing. The two are
different. The two methods are trying to
William Unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote:
What are you using? Are you on ntpd or chrony?
Please do not followup to my postings when you don't care to follow
the thread!
___
questions mailing list
questions@lists.ntp.org
28 matches
Mail list logo
