On 2013-03-07, E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the BlackLists
Null@BlackList.Anitech-Systems.invalid wrote:
unruh wrote:
I am positive that no matter where you live, the television
show Survivor has made its appearance.
I bet they don't get that in North Korea.
Not at all
On 2013-03-06, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote:
On 2013-03-05, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote:
On 2013-03-05, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
David Woolley david@ex.djwhome.demon.invalid wrote:
Abu Abdullah wrote:
Does this mean ntpd
On 2013-03-06, folkert folk...@vanheusden.com wrote:
[ garmin 18x lvc offsets ]
...
Now when I run either 4.2.6p5 or dev-4.2.7p359, I always get an offset
of ~1s.
...
If I use 4.2.5p158 instead, the synchronization is perfect, on both
systems.
Agreed that it's unlikely to be a firmware
On 2013-03-05, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
David Woolley david@ex.djwhome.demon.invalid wrote:
Abu Abdullah wrote:
Does this mean ntpd is not supposed to be run in parallel? Is there any
It is not seen as something anyone would want to do.
I could understand why someone would want to
On 2013-03-05, Abu Abdullah falcon.sh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 11:12 PM, E-Mail Sent to this address will be added
to the BlackLists Null@blacklist.anitech-systems.invalid wrote:
Abu Abdullah wrote:
I'm trying to run two instances of ntp
They are going to fight each other
On 2013-03-04, 1900116857 1900116...@qq.com wrote:
Dear sir,
I'm a student from Asia.
My OS is Ubuntu12.04amd64
I dowloaded the NTP4.2.6p5 package and installed it with following commands:
configure
make
make install
Installation seems successful. No error is reported. But there still
On 2013-03-05, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote:
On 2013-03-05, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
David Woolley david@ex.djwhome.demon.invalid wrote:
Abu Abdullah wrote:
Does this mean ntpd is not supposed to be run in parallel? Is there any
It is not seen
the clock.
One would normally simply set suitable access restrictions for un-named
clients. I think the defaults are probably adequate.
The point is that it is not important what you (and unruh) think.
Here on the newsgroup the answer to all questions is always you don't
want to do
On 2013-03-04, janfr...@tanso.net janfr...@tanso.net wrote:
I have access to two external stratum-1 ntp-servers (one GPS and one with
both GPS and long wave radio), and one company internal stratum-1/GPS, plus
I'm considering if we should have a second company internal stratum-1. The
On 2013-03-04, janfr...@tanso.net janfr...@tanso.net wrote:
kl. 21:20:46 UTC+1 mandag 4. mars 2013 skrev unruh f?lgende:
Virtualisation and time keeping should be kept as far apart as possible.
Time keeping should be done by the base OS, not by one of the virtual
ones. Otherwise you
On 2013-03-01, Richard B. Gilbert rgilber...@comcast.net wrote:
On 2/28/2013 6:03 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Ralph Aichinger ra...@pangea.at said:
Has anybody *two* GPIO PPS devices on different GPIO
pins on their Raspberry Pi? Would a setup like this
enable the ntpd to check
On 2013-02-28, Ralph Aichinger ra...@pangea.at wrote:
Has anybody *two* GPIO PPS devices on different GPIO
pins on their Raspberry Pi? Would a setup like this
enable the ntpd to check the devices against eachother
(or probably more likely give an idea of interrupt
handling capabilities)?
On 2013-02-28, rama...@gmail.com rama...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, February 28, 2013 3:53:22 PM UTC+10, unruh wrote:
On 2013-02-28, ramadog wrote:
Up to that 8us point it is the same behaviour I have been seeing since
2008.
I did this graph April 11 2008 http://users.on.net/~boddingt
On 2013-02-28, Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net wrote:
Once upon a time, Ralph Aichinger ra...@pangea.at said:
Has anybody *two* GPIO PPS devices on different GPIO
pins on their Raspberry Pi? Would a setup like this
enable the ntpd to check the devices against eachother
(or probably more likely
On 2013-02-26, rama...@gmail.com rama...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, February 26, 2013 10:57:22 AM UTC+10, unruh wrote:
handling. And I only saw 1-2 us difference. Why are you getting 12us on
the ldisc code?
The 11us in my case is how long it takes to get from early in the interrupt
code
On 2013-02-26, rama...@gmail.com rama...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, February 26, 2013 10:57:22 AM UTC+10, unruh wrote:
handling. And I only saw 1-2 us difference. Why are you getting 12us on
the ldisc code?
The 11us in my case is how long it takes to get from early in the interrupt
code
On 2013-02-28, Edward T. Mischanko etm1...@hotmail.com wrote:
When ntpd loads via rc.d at system start-up it just locks-up.
It doesn't finish loading what is in the rc.conf or give me a login prompt.
I have to control c out of it to regain control of the computer, but that
terminates ntpd.
On 2013-02-26, Charles Elliott elliott...@verizon.net wrote:
I performed the same kind of test on a commercial real-time O/S at
the time sold by Intel, but since divested. I put code in a program to
output a digital pulse when the mock application program received
notification of the
On 2013-02-26, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
Richard B. Gilbert rgilber...@comcast.net wrote:
I think that many hardware terminals e.g. VT100 or VT320 do not handle
long lines well.
I can't see any reason why anyone would need to send more than 132
characters in one line of text!
You may
On 2013-02-25, Trevor Woerner twoer...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
I have been getting the following pattern show up in my log files and
I'm hoping to better understand why and perhaps figure out how to
improve the situation.
I have two machines. One of which, the server, is syncing to an
On 2013-02-26, Trevor Woerner twoer...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi David,
Thank you for your reply.
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 10:09 AM, David Taylor
david-tay...@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid wrote:
The current NTP is 4.2.6, with 4.2.7 at an advanced development stage. My
first suggestion would be to
On 2013-02-25, Miroslav Lichvar mlich...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 01:44:02PM +0100, Kasper Pedersen wrote:
From the PPS arrives, and to the kernel timestamps it, is a very long time.
I wrote this to measure it:
http://n1.taur.dk/edgetest.c
(you will need a linux machine,
On 2013-02-26, rama...@gmail.com rama...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, February 26, 2013 6:32:53 AM UTC+10, unruh wrote:
When I ran a test many years ago I used a program to put out a rising
pulse onto one of the printer port output pins, and then connected that
to the parallel port nack
On 2013-02-24, bodo...@gmail.com bodo...@gmail.com wrote:
I can't find or figure out how to validate my ntp results.
I (currently) have two Linux boxes with PPS via the NMEA driver from
Garmins (18 18x) and a Sure board connected to a purpose built
NTP server. When I set up my first Garmin
On 2013-02-21, Mike S mi...@flatsurface.com wrote:
On 2/21/2013 8:52 AM, Brian Utterback wrote:
Having said that, I note that Ed Mischanko's mailer is not sending
text/plain flowed. So unruh has a point in that case.
On 2/21/2013 8:38 AM, Brian Utterback wrote:
Hate to get into a religious
On 2013-02-22, Brian Utterback brian.utterb...@oracle.com wrote:
On 2/21/2013 7:00 PM, unruh wrote:
Note that rmc 5322 is 2008. Many of the news readers are older than
that.
Another reason to refer to the RFC I quoted, which dates back to the 90's.
So, it would appear that is the poster
On 2013-02-22, Mike S mi...@flatsurface.com wrote:
On 2/21/2013 7:00 PM, unruh wrote:
Note that rmc 5322 is 2008. Many of the news readers are older than
that.
What's your point? Prior to 2008, RFC822 (1982) applied, which places no
restrictions on line length. Or, if you prefer, RFC2046
On 2013-02-20, E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the BlackLists
Null@BlackList.Anitech-Systems.invalid wrote:
On 2/20/2013 12:17 PM, Richard B. Gilbert wrote:
The Thunderbird Mail Client does NOT automagically insert
line breaks when the sender has failed to do so.
Fortunately,
On 2013-02-21, Mike S mi...@flatsurface.com wrote:
On 2/19/2013 1:51 AM, Richard B. Gilbert wrote:
I have an Enter key on my keyboard and I use it! It doesn't seem to
me to be rocket science to use an Enter key, or a Return key
somewhere between 1 and 120 characters.
No sense getting upset
On 2013-02-16, David Taylor david-tay...@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid wrote:
On 15/02/2013 21:18, unruh wrote:
[]
It is also not an issue if you do not buy Garmin. But so what? If you
buy old stock it is an issue. You CAN fix it as you say, but you must
fix it. It is like saying that if you buy
On 2013-02-15, David Taylor david-tay...@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid wrote:
On 14/02/2013 22:00, unruh wrote:
[]
It was not an issue of stability, but of the notification of which
second. It was coming out more than one second after the second it is
labeling. Germin was very resistant
On 2013-02-14, David Woolley david@ex.djwhome.demon.invalid wrote:
unruh wrote:
If it were out by 1us, it would put you out by almost a km on the
surface of the earth.
That's a requirement for the relative time from two satellites. The
absolute time and any propagation effect
On 2013-02-14, Mischanko, Edward T edward.mischa...@arcelormittal.com wrote:
And what exactly is wrong with the Garmin 18x? I have found my 18x to be
much more stable than the Sure Electronics one.
The Garmin 18x had a bug in its firmware so that itsometimes put out the time
over a second
, it apparently is not true anymore.
On 11/02/2013 23:56, unruh wrote:
[]
You are always at the mercy of the receiver.
And it is not the fix time. ZDA puts out only to the nearest 10 ms. the
others to the nearest second or 10ths of a second. Fix
times are in the nanosecond realm. They put out
On 2013-02-13, Ralph Aichinger ra...@pangea.at wrote:
After having my Raspberry Pi with PPS running, with an
offset and jitter value in the region of 1 to 5 microseconds,
I am wondering: How precise is the PPS signal of typical
consumer hardware (MTK chips, etc.)?
Sub microsecond to tens of
On 2013-02-13, Ralph Aichinger ra...@pangea.at wrote:
Terje Mathisen terje.mathisen at tmsw.no wrote:
Unless you replace the motherboard clock source, anything below ~us
precision is wasted.
Good to know. So basically the 1 or 2??s jitter I get after everything
has had time to settle down
On 2013-02-12, David Taylor david-tay...@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid wrote:
On 11/02/2013 23:56, unruh wrote:
[]
You are always at the mercy of the receiver.
And it is not the fix time. ZDA puts out only to the nearest 10 ms. the
others to the nearest second or 10ths of a second. Fix
times
[Followup-To: header set to comp.protocols.time.ntp.]
On 2013-02-11, Robert Scott no-one@notreal.invalid wrote:
On Sat, 09 Feb 2013 17:18:25 GMT, unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote:
On 2013-02-08, Ivan Shmakov oneing...@gmail.com wrote:
David Woolley david@ex.djwhome.demon.invalid writes
On 2013-02-11, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote:
Please put carriage returns into your posts. These run on sentences can
be very hard to read.
Please get a decent newsreader instead of picking on posting format.
I thought the OP was trying to communicate with us
On 2013-02-10, Val Schmidt vschm...@ccom.unh.edu wrote:
Hello everyone,
I have a handful of questions regarding the implementation of the NTP NMEA
(and 1PPS) driver.
As I'm sure many of you know, these drivers synchronize a local clock using
any of a handful of NMEA sentences (ZDA, RMC,
On 2013-02-08, Ivan Shmakov oneing...@gmail.com wrote:
David Woolley david@ex.djwhome.demon.invalid writes:
[Cross-posting, and setting Followup-To:, to news:comp.dsp.]
[...]
In Fourier terms, the spectral width of a piano note is going to be
more than 12ppm and depend on the exact
On 2013-02-06, Robert Scott no-one@notreal.invalid wrote:
Here is a related question: Suppose I wanted to improve my SNTP
implementation by accessing several servers in a short span of time?
And how will this improve things?
(But I don't want the full overhead of NTP.) If DNS caching is
On 2013-02-06, Robert Scott no-one@notreal.invalid wrote:
On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 21:27:56 +, David Woolley
david@ex.djwhome.demon.invalid wrote:
no-...@no-place.org wrote:
where hints has been set up to define a socket type of SOCK_DGRAM and
family of AF_INET. As expected, the Internet
On 2013-02-07, E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the BlackLists
Null@BlackList.Anitech-Systems.invalid wrote:
Robert Scott wrote:
the Android SDK.
It would seem like what you could do in a short amount
of time, would instead take several hours.
His concern is that rate,
On 2013-01-30, John Connor john.con...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I'm running ntpd v4.2.6p3 on Solaris 8 (I know; necessity..) and recently it
experienced a panic_stop event:
24 Jan 00:36:15 ntpd[244]: 82.219.4.30 961a 8a sys_peer
24 Jan 06:55:26 ntpd[244]: 0.0.0.0 0628 08 no_sys_peer
24 Jan
On 2013-01-28, Jeroen Mostert jmost...@xs4all.nl wrote:
On 2013-01-28 23:04, unruh wrote:
On 2013-01-28, Jeroen Mostertjmost...@xs4all.nl wrote:
On 2013-01-27 23:43, unruh wrote:
On 2013-01-27, David Taylordavid-tay...@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid wrote:
On 27/01/2013 19:33, unruh wrote
On 2013-01-30, A C agcarver+...@acarver.net wrote:
On 1/29/2013 12:04, unruh wrote:
Actually for a piano, there is ALWAYS beating. The three strings have
three modes, and it is impossible to tune all those three modes to the
same frequency, because the soundboard couples them. Thus the three
On 2013-01-28, jack flora flora...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like to know if NTP can be used to measure latency between
publishers and subscribers in a distributed computing environment. NTP is
configured on all the nodes. How do I use the statistics collected on both
the nodes to measure
On 2013-01-26, deepak khandelwal dazz...@gmail.com wrote:
hi,
Is there any configuration support in ntp by which i can drop to the local
reference clock at desired stratum value (received from server)
basically i want to drop to my local clock as my servers reach to stratum
level 10 ?
There
On 2013-01-28, Jeroen Mostert jmost...@xs4all.nl wrote:
On 2013-01-27 23:43, unruh wrote:
On 2013-01-27, David Taylordavid-tay...@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid wrote:
On 27/01/2013 19:33, unruh wrote:
On 2013-01-27, no-...@no-place.orgno-...@no-place.org wrote:
[]
In case you are wondering, my
On 2013-01-28, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
no-...@no-place.org no-...@no-place.org wrote:
On 28 Jan 2013 09:57:00 GMT, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
There will be the extra complication that a UMTS connection goes into
a sleep mode when there is little or no traffic. To wake it up
you need
On 2013-01-27, no-...@no-place.org no-...@no-place.org wrote:
@unruh: You are exactly right. Whatever network jitter there is I
just need to have a calibration run sufficiently long so that the
derived frequency is close enough. Given infinite time I can make
Well, no. the problem
On 2013-01-27, David Taylor david-tay...@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid wrote:
On 27/01/2013 19:33, unruh wrote:
On 2013-01-27, no-...@no-place.org no-...@no-place.org wrote:
[]
In case you are wondering, my app is a professional piano tuning app.
The standard in this industry is that tuning
On 2013-01-26, David Woolley david@ex.djwhome.demon.invalid wrote:
no-...@no-place.org wrote:
small packets. A calibration run would consist of an initial NTP
syncronization with an audio packet, followed by a period of some
What you are describing here isn't, I think, the use of NTP, but
On 2013-01-19, Mischanko, Edward T edward.mischa...@arcelormittal.com wrote:
I have my mail program at work set the break the line at 66 characters. If
that is still too wide, please let me know. As for the sarcasm, I think it is
unhelpful and irritating at best; it too can be considered OT.
On 2013-01-19, Mischanko, Edward T edward.mischa...@arcelormittal.com wrote:
Unruh,
I have now set the line length to 50 characters. I have no idea what your
requirements are; I am trying to please you! As for OT, I would have
contacted you directly, but you have an invalid email address
On 2013-01-18, Mischanko, Edward T edward.mischa...@arcelormittal.com wrote:
Microsoft Outlook supports well and line length is configurable to any
length you want when mailing in plain text mode. My newsfeed program at
home, Microsoft Live Mail, I have yet to figure out how to configure
On 2013-01-15, Edward T. Mischanko etm1...@hotmail.com wrote:
associd=0 status=011d leap_none, sync_pps, 1 event, kern,
version=ntpd 4.2.7p347@1.2483-o Mon Jan 7 19:42:41 UTC 2013 (1),
processor=i386, system=FreeBSD/8.2-RELEASE, leap=00, stratum=1,
precision=-15, rootdelay=0.000,
On 2013-01-15, Edward T. Mischanko etm1...@hotmail.com wrote:
unruh wrote in message news:0RgJs.101361$2v@newsfe05.iad...
On 2013-01-15, Edward T. Mischanko etm1...@hotmail.com wrote:
associd=0 status=011d leap_none, sync_pps, 1 event, kern,
version=ntpd 4.2.7p347@1.2483-o Mon Jan
On 2013-01-09, thelastroman...@live.fr thelastroman...@live.fr wrote:
Hi,
Thanks, it seems to work.
So, i just need nanoseconds precision with this 1pps on my localhost,
don't need NTP or other.
You will NOT get nanosecond precision. If that is your goal, give up
now. No computer can reach
On 2013-01-07, Richard B. Gilbert rgilber...@comcast.net wrote:
On 1/6/2013 3:45 AM, Mischanko, Edward T wrote:
-Original Message-
From: questions-
bounces+edward.mischanko=arcelormittal@lists.ntp.org
[mailto:questions-
bounces+edward.mischanko=arcelormittal@lists.ntp.org]
On 2012-12-28, Uwe Klein u...@klein-habertwedt.de wrote:
David Woolley wrote:
David Taylor wrote:
I'm used to the Windows implementation of NTP, which doesn't have the
same PPS implementation. I guess that the Linux type 20 driver must
The Windows implementation of NTP is w32time
On 2012-12-26, joerg.wieg...@googlemail.com joerg.wieg...@googlemail.com
wrote:
what are the right settings in ntp.conf to allow public access?
That is by default.
But you have to make sure that port 123 is not being filtered out by
your firewall.
On 2012-12-26, Ran Shalit ransha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I intend to use SNTP protocol with 2 machines connected by LAN.
According to decumentatio about SNTP it sys that SNTP provides
accuracy typically within 100 ms.
Not sure where this nonesense was written.
I would like to ask please
On 2012-12-27, Ran Shalit ransha...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 11:24 AM, unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote:
delay be constant within 100msec, meaning
Hi,
SNPT performance with talks about accuracy of 100msec are shown in the
following white paper:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech
On 2012-12-22, Mischanko, Edward T edward.mischa...@arcelormittal.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Mischanko, Edward T
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2012 9:14 PM
Subject: RE: [ntp:questions] Clock Offset
-Original Message-
From: questions-
On 2012-12-18, Mischanko, Edward T edward.mischa...@arcelormittal.com wrote:
How can my local clock have a negative offset when none of the selected peers
have a negative offset? Is it possible?
Get rid of your local clock. You should NOT have a local clock set. It
is a mistake. (except in
On 2012-12-19, Hal Murray hal-use...@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net wrote:
In article 50d1c5b9.8020...@oracle.com,
Brian Utterback brian.utterb...@oracle.com writes:
No, you are missing the point. You have two clocks in this scenario, the
kernel clock and the network controller clock. If one
On 2012-12-17, reader7 website.read...@gmail.com wrote:
For some strange reason an ntp process is erasing older loops files in the
/var/log/ntpstats folder. I want to save all loops files for the whole
calendar year.
What setting do I have to change, so that this will occur?
ntpd does
On 2012-12-13, E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the BlackLists
Null@BlackList.Anitech-Systems.invalid wrote:
Jeroen Mostert wrote: BlackLists wrote:
ntpq -c rv0 precision
should give a clue how close you can expect to get on
a given machine.
I assume you mean 'ntpq -c rv 0
On 2012-12-13, Jeroen Mostert jmost...@xs4all.nl wrote:
On 2012-12-13 09:08, David Woolley wrote:
Jeroen Mostert wrote:
negatively affect performance of the host (which makes sense, since driving
all virtuals with 1000 interrupts/sec can't be easy). Even so,
You wouldn't expect 1ms ticks.
On 2012-12-12, andreas.a...@de.transport.bombardier.com
andreas.a...@de.transport.bombardier.com wrote:
Dear all,
I'm rather new to NTP so please forgive me, if my question is trivial.
I'm maintaining a legacy system with its own proprietary time
Why be coy. Why not tell us what that
On 2012-12-12, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote:
On 2012-12-12, andreas.a...@de.transport.bombardier.com
andreas.a...@de.transport.bombardier.com wrote:
Dear all,
I'm rather new to NTP so please forgive me, if my question is trivial.
I'm maintaining a legacy
On 2012-12-12, andreas.a...@de.transport.bombardier.com
andreas.a...@de.transport.bombardier.com wrote:
Hi unruh,
unruh un...@invalid.ca schrieb am 12.12.2012 18:37:33:
On 2012-12-12, andreas.a...@de.transport.bombardier.com andreas.
a...@de.transport.bombardier.com wrote:
Dear all
On 2012-12-12, E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the BlackLists
Null@BlackList.Anitech-Systems.invalid wrote:
unruh wrote:
...
I do not think any of these are an answer to his problem.
He has two computers A and B. A's clock is disciplined
by some other program, but he wants
On 2012-12-10, Jeroen Mostert jmost...@xs4all.nl wrote:
On 2012-12-09 16:10, Jeroen Mostert wrote:
On 2012-12-09 16:00, Jeroen Mostert wrote:
I'm going to leave it alone for a bit to see the results after ntpd gets
some
time to stabilize. For reference, I've done all of the following so far:
. That someone would not
yet
be me.
If I offset the offsets (pardon my math) by -33 milliseconds, I'd roughly
have a
zero axis that they'd be swinging around with a range of -10/+10. According
to
unruh, even that would still be horrible in terms of accuracy, so I'm not
sure
if that's
On 2012-12-11, Mischanko, Edward T edward.mischa...@arcelormittal.com wrote:
Please tell me why when watching my client with NTP Time Server Monitor by
Meinberg, my client does not honor the NTP_MAXCLOCK setting in the ntp.h file.
Why do you thing your client does not honour that setting? And
On 2012-12-08, Jeroen Mostert jmost...@xs4all.nl wrote:
If my event log is to be believed, ntpd is adjusting the clock to times in
the
past (with pretty big intervals):
Log Name: System
Source:Microsoft-Windows-Kernel-General
Date: 2012-12-08 15:18:52
Event ID:
On 2012-11-27, gabs gsrica...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, November 25, 2012 3:56:28 AM UTC+8, David Taylor wrote:
I've just started the statistics collection on my Linux/RPi NTP server,
and when plotting the jitter results I found that most of the values
were zero. I don't see that on my
On 2012-11-27, David Taylor david-tay...@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid wrote:
On 27/11/2012 15:13, unruh wrote:
On 2012-11-27, David Taylor david-tay...@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid wrote:
Ralph, thanks for your pointer about rebuilding the kernel. Not
trivial, is it!
BTW: this post seems to have
On 2012-11-21, David Taylor david-tay...@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid wrote:
On 20/11/2012 11:12, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 06:03:06PM +, David Taylor wrote:
On both systems, sudo modprobe pps_ldisc produces no output.
No message is a good message :).
I have no idea
On 2012-11-18, Ralph Aichinger ra...@pangea.at wrote:
As the Raspberry Pi I am currently using as a NTP box has
an audio output available, I am wondering if this otherwise
unused output (on a dedicated NTP box) could be used to
generate BBC style pips or other audible time signals?
On 2012-11-17, Brian Utterback brian.utterb...@oracle.com wrote:
On 11/16/2012 6:03 PM, Rob wrote:
Harlan Stenn st...@ntp.org wrote:
I don't understand the problem.
It doesn't matter why the destination machine is unreachable, or when it
becomes unreachable.
Time from that source is valid
On 2012-11-16, Jonatan Walck jwa...@netnod.se wrote:
On 11/16/2012 01:55 AM, Charles Elliott wrote:
131.107.13.100 is also a Microsoft time server; it appears to work
well. I wrote to the email address given in whois to find the URL
for it, but never received a reply.
Charles Elliott
On 2012-11-16, Jun Hu duanshui...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi David
You've only lost three of the last 8 samples from that server.
--- where do you get that ? the reach value or other ?
Yes. One bit for each of the last 8 polls. Three bits are zero, and 5
bits are 1 (indicating reply
On 2012-11-16, Jun Hu duanshui...@hotmail.com wrote:
now, I need to configure ntp server and client in a private network
environment, supposed that:
Server A -- client B,servers and clients are all linux physical machine.
server A
--
ntp.conf
On 2012-11-16, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote:
AFter a while it will. Right now it has only missed three pollings of
the server ( and since ntpd throws away 7 out of 8 polls anyway that is
too little) so wait another 10 hours and see if the * remains. Your
machine
On 2012-11-15, David Taylor david-tay...@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid wrote:
On 15/11/2012 07:22, unruh wrote:
[]
Actually more like 2 microseconds accuracy should be possible, unless
the Raspberry Pi's servicing of the GPIO interrupt is really very bad.
http://www.satsignal.eu/ntp
other source of time?
Charles Elliott
-Original Message-
From: questions-bounces+elliott.ch=verizon@lists.ntp.org
[mailto:questions-bounces+elliott.ch=verizon@lists.ntp.org] On
Behalf Of unruh
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 1:43 AM
To: questions@lists.ntp.org
Subject: Re
On 2012-11-14, David Woolley david@ex.djwhome.demon.invalid wrote:
David Taylor wrote:
The secret has been to make a tight connection between the Windows PCs
and the best available stratum-1 server by fixing the polling at 32
seconds. In your case, this may correspond to a line like:
On 2012-11-14, gbusenb...@yahoo.com gbusenb...@yahoo.com wrote:
They HP DL 380 G7 Servers. Sorry for the typo. No virtual machines are
being used. Each Windows 2008 Server has dedicated hardware and is almost
idle in terms of load. Yesterday after making the changes of getting rid of
the
On 2012-11-15, Richard B. Gilbert rgilber...@comcast.net wrote:
On 11/14/2012 12:02 AM, E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the
BlackLists wrote:
gbusenb...@yahoo.com wrote:
I am now left with two lines in ntp.conf
driftfile C:\Program Files\NTP\etc\ntp.drift
server 10.1.126.204
On 2012-11-15, David Taylor david-tay...@blueyonder.co.uk.invalid wrote:
On 14/11/2012 21:40, gbusenb...@yahoo.com wrote:
[]
Below ntpq -p from my 10.1.126.202 server which gets time from 10.1.126.204.
I see there is a lot of Jitter. Is the offset of 259ms.
remote refid
On 2012-11-13, gbusenb...@yahoo.com gbusenb...@yahoo.com wrote:
I am not sure if this is possible. I have a requirement from a customer that
the time must be within 10ms of the parent server which is on the same LAN.
I have tried several different things without an luck. NTP Time seems to
On 2012-11-14, gbusenb...@yahoo.com gbusenb...@yahoo.com wrote:
Thanks everybody. Seems like everybody. I have removed the tinker line and
agree that it sounds like these two lines are not needed either. They were
the defualts.
server 127.127.1.0
fudge 127.127.1.0 stratum 12
I am
On 2012-11-14, Rick Jones rick.jon...@hp.com wrote:
unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote:
I hae no idea what HM DL380G7 means
Likely as not, that is a slight typographical error for HP DL380 G7
- a 2U, two-socket Intel-based server in the HP ProLiant line.
http://h18004.www1.hp.com/products
...@lists.ntp.org] On
Behalf Of David Woolley
Sent: Friday, 2 November 2012 12:32 AM
To: questions@lists.ntp.org
Subject: Re: What is the NTP recovery time from 16s step
inGPSserver?
unruh wrote:
Interrupt latencies in my measurements tended to be at the one or 2
microsecond level. (drive a pin
On 2012-11-01, David Woolley david@ex.djwhome.demon.invalid wrote:
David Taylor wrote:
On a recent restart from cold, the server here took about 15 minutes to
get to within 250 microseconds, and about an hour to be within 10
microseconds. Ultimately it is within about 3 microseconds.
3
On 2012-11-01, David Woolley david@ex.djwhome.demon.invalid wrote:
David Taylor wrote:
On 01/11/2012 08:40, David Woolley wrote:
David Taylor wrote:
On a recent restart from cold, the server here took about 15 minutes
to get to within 250 microseconds, and about an hour to be within 10
601 - 700 of 2339 matches
Mail list logo
