Hi--
On Apr 7, 2014, at 4:39 PM, Harlan Stenn wrote:
> Charles Swiger writes:
[ ... ]
>> However, the transition doesn't happen any faster if you only use one
>> server with iburst, or with all of the server lines. The data I've
>> seen doesn't show any significant differences to the local clock
Charles Swiger writes:
> On Apr 7, 2014, at 12:12 PM, Harlan Stenn wrote:
> > Why would you not want to iburst all of the servers?
>
> iburst helps to populate the reachability field quickly.
> That reduces the interval it takes for an NTP server to move from:
>
> associd=0 status=c012 leap_alar
On 2014-04-07, Charles Swiger wrote:
> On Apr 7, 2014, at 12:12 PM, Harlan Stenn wrote:
>> Charles Swiger writes:
>>> For a given S2 server, say NTP1, I'd recommend:
>>>
>>> server S1-1 iburst prefer
[snip]
>> How do you select which server to prefer?
>
> Absent any detailed knowledge of the
Hi--
On Apr 7, 2014, at 12:12 PM, Harlan Stenn wrote:
> Why would you not want to iburst all of the servers?
iburst helps to populate the reachability field quickly.
That reduces the interval it takes for an NTP server to move from:
associd=0 status=c012 leap_alarm, sync_unspec, 1 event, freq_s
Hi--
On Apr 7, 2014, at 12:12 PM, Harlan Stenn wrote:
> Charles Swiger writes:
>> For a given S2 server, say NTP1, I'd recommend:
>>
>> server S1-1 iburst prefer
>> server S1-2
>> server S1-3
>> server S1-4
>> server _some_outside_box_
>> peer NTP2
>> peer NTP3
>
> Why would you not want to ibu
Charles Swiger writes:
> For a given S2 server, say NTP1, I'd recommend:
>
> server S1-1 iburst prefer
> server S1-2
> server S1-3
> server S1-4
> server _some_outside_box_
> peer NTP2
> peer NTP3
Why would you not want to iburst all of the servers?
How do you select which server to prefer?
--
Hi--
On Apr 6, 2014, at 8:13 AM, Jason Rabel wrote:
> Charles Swiger wrote:
>> Your comment means a discussion of best practices of configuring
>> these stratum-1s is also beyond the scope of answers to your post.
>> Odd, but have this as you would
>
> Charles, my S1 servers are a mixture of
"Jason Rabel" writes:
> Charles Swiger wrote:
> > Don't bother using more than one iburst entry per server.
>
> I think your wording is a little confusing. Are you saying only use
> iburst on one remote server and not all of them?
I'm curious about this as well. iburst is your friend.
> I was r
Charles Swiger wrote:
> Your comment means a discussion of best practices of configuring
> these stratum-1s is also beyond the scope of answers to your post.
> Odd, but have this as you would
Charles, my S1 servers are a mixture of NTP appliances and other hardware that
do not run the standar
"Jason Rabel" writes:
> I'm reconfiguring my NTP setup to try and be somewhat fault-resistant
> if GPS blacks out since my receiver is in the window and only picks up
> facing east.
>
> I have four stratum-1 servers connected to GPS receivers. The
> stratum-1 servers are configured to be completel
On Apr 5, 2014, at 11:45 AM, Jason Rabel wrote:
[ ... ]
> I have four stratum-1 servers connected to GPS receivers. The stratum-1
> servers are configured to be completely independent, they don't talk to each
> other (for reasons beyond the scope of this post). They get their time solely
> from
Figured I would ask just to double-check I'm doing this right since it's my
first time using the "peer" statement.
I'm reconfiguring my NTP setup to try and be somewhat fault-resistant if GPS
blacks out since my receiver is in the window and only
picks up facing east.
I have four stratum-1 serv
12 matches
Mail list logo
