Harlan Stenn st...@ntp.org wrote:
William Unruh writes:
On 2014-04-25, Paul tik-...@bodosom.net wrote:
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 4:36 PM, William Unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote:
Why shoul dit ship with no refclocks? ... DO you have the same opinion for
serial
port or parallel ports, or
On a Linux system we ran into the problem that port 123 has been blocked
for incoming traffic (probably as a general countermeasure against
abuse of badly configured servers, this server was configured correctly).
As it is not possible to change the source port number in ntpd, I
translated the
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 11:18 PM, William Unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote:
As do you-- generalising from your one situation.
Are you actually suggesting that the number of refclocks is a
non-negligible fraction of the number of clients? Even if you only include
Linux that makes no sense.
Most
On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 3:33 AM, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
The point is that the program is compiled
with a fixed set of refclocks that is unneccessarily limited because
the environment it was compiled in was not complete.
Are you saying that the ntpd that ships with Ubuntu 14.04 is
Paul tik-...@bodosom.net wrote:
On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 3:33 AM, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
The point is that the program is compiled
with a fixed set of refclocks that is unneccessarily limited because
the environment it was compiled in was not complete.
Are you saying that the ntpd
I am saying that the ntpd that ships with Ubuntu 14.04 is limited because
it was built on a system where timepps.h was not present, and thus the
ATOM and JUPITER (and a couple other) refclocks were not included in the
binary. Even though PPS support is present in the kernel.
I built ntpd
On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Jason Rabel
ja...@extremeoverclocking.comwrote:
Don't you think that is a gripe for the people over at Ubuntu?
Well maybe. The OP was directed to Linux distributors but in this case
that's Debian not Ubuntu. But to your point -- even if you don't much care
Jason Rabel ja...@extremeoverclocking.com wrote:
I am saying that the ntpd that ships with Ubuntu 14.04 is limited because
it was built on a system where timepps.h was not present, and thus the
ATOM and JUPITER (and a couple other) refclocks were not included in the
binary. Even though PPS
On 2014-04-26, Jason Rabel ja...@extremeoverclocking.com wrote:
I am saying that the ntpd that ships with Ubuntu 14.04 is limited because
it was built on a system where timepps.h was not present, and thus the
ATOM and JUPITER (and a couple other) refclocks were not included in the
binary.
William Unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote:
On 2014-04-26, Jason Rabel ja...@extremeoverclocking.com wrote:
I am saying that the ntpd that ships with Ubuntu 14.04 is limited because
it was built on a system where timepps.h was not present, and thus the
ATOM and JUPITER (and a couple other) refclocks
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 11:22 PM, William Unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote:
I have 8 machines that reliably sync from one GPS PPS driven
machine (all using chrony) and they get time reliability of about
10microseconds
How do you determine the 10 micosec. value?
And why are you conflating NTP
On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 6:30 PM, Rob nom...@example.com wrote:
Can't they add just one simple package to that?
Well pps-tools is clearly special. E.g. it's no longer advertised for 12.04
___
questions mailing list
questions@lists.ntp.org
William Unruh writes:
Well, ntpd could include timepps.h into ntpd source and point to it,
instead of using the system one.
Is there only one version of that file that is compatible with the
places NTP will be built? What sort of bit-rot issues are there if we
include a copy of the file in the
On 2014-04-26, Paul tik-...@bodosom.net wrote:
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 11:22 PM, William Unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote:
I have 8 machines that reliably sync from one GPS PPS driven
machine (all using chrony) and they get time reliability of about
10microseconds
How do you determine the 10
On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 8:30 PM, William Unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote:
use the offset scatter as an estimate of the
time performace (It is at least some sort of upper bound, but as I have
said, not terribly accurate)
I suspect you shouting CANNOT is probably overstating the issue. After all
On 2014-04-27, Paul tik-...@bodosom.net wrote:
On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 8:30 PM, William Unruh un...@invalid.ca wrote:
use the offset scatter as an estimate of the
time performace (It is at least some sort of upper bound, but as I have
said, not terribly accurate)
I suspect you shouting
On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 5:05 PM, Paul tik-...@bodosom.net wrote:
I think it's fair to wonder why the NTP tar ball doesn't include
timepps-Linux.h along with others they do include.
On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 7:54 PM, Harlan Stenn st...@ntp.org wrote:
Is there only one version of that file
Le 27 avr. 2014 à 05:36, Paul a écrit :
On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 5:05 PM, Paul tik-...@bodosom.net wrote:
I think it's fair to wonder why the NTP tar ball doesn't include
timepps-Linux.h along with others they do include.
On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 7:54 PM, Harlan Stenn st...@ntp.org
18 matches
Mail list logo
