Please let me know your thoughts on the above statement.
I am encouraging the use of atomic time NTP server devices rather than DNS
servers to serve time.
I need to justify, not using DNS servers, to serve time. Please advise.
___
questions mailing
Hi,
Generalizations such as that have practically no meaning. All I can say is IT
DEPENDS. You need to know more about the servers in question.
You need to ask:
Where will the DNS servers get their time?
Are the DNS servers heavily loaded, even intermittently?
What
On -10.01.-28163 20:59, kartik.u...@gmail.com wrote:
I am encouraging the use of atomic time NTP server devices rather than
DNS servers to serve time.
I need to justify, not using DNS servers, to serve time. Please advise.
Well the *obvious* argument would be that you want your DNS servers
Rob wrote:
Martin Burnicki martin.burni...@meinberg.de wrote:
Hi,
sorry for stepping in so late, but I've been on vacation with limited
internet access.
garrettbrian1...@gmail.com schrieb:
I have been trying to install the Meinberg NTP build for Windows and
the install is going through, yet
On 2014-06-18, kartik.u...@gmail.com kartik.u...@gmail.com wrote:
Please let me know your thoughts on the above statement.
I am encouraging the use of atomic time NTP server devices rather than DNS
servers to serve time.
I need to justify, not using DNS servers, to serve time. Please
Others have made good points, and I'll just add that DNSSEC requires
good time.
--
Harlan Stenn st...@ntp.org
http://networktimefoundation.org - be a member!
___
questions mailing list
questions@lists.ntp.org
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NTP_server_misuse_and_abuse
brian.cun...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a suggested way to rate-limit queries by broken clients?
Firewall rules?
{Depends how broken the remote client is,
sometimes this makes them hammer more,
if you can get you ISP to block them
jthul...@gmail.com wrote:
Does it mean that if I set the minpoll and maxpoll values to 4
If you do that for external servers, they may consider that abuse.
For _your_ / _your_companies_ servers it can be anything you want.
For _your_ reference clocks whatever works best.
--
E-Mail Sent to
kartik.u...@gmail.com wrote:
Please let me know your thoughts on the above statement.
I am encouraging the use of atomic time NTP server devices rather than DNS
servers to serve time.
I need to justify, not using DNS servers, to serve time. Please advise.
_Your_ DNS servers can certainly be
Get the fudge time(s) right,
prefer the PPS,
increase mindist.
--
E-Mail Sent to this address blackl...@anitech-systems.com
will be added to the BlackLists.
___
questions mailing list
questions@lists.ntp.org
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 4:04 PM, E-Mail Sent to this address will be added
to the BlackLists Null@blacklist.anitech-systems.invalid wrote:
prefer the PPS,
The point was that you can't prefer the PPS driver.
While this driver can discipline the time and frequency relative to the
PPS source,
On 2014-06-18 13:32, E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the
BlackLists wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NTP_server_misuse_and_abuse
brian.cun...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a suggested way to rate-limit queries by broken clients?
Firewall rules?
{Depends how broken the remote
12 matches
Mail list logo
