Dear all,
I noticed a documentation error in complex.Rd. A patch that corrects
the error is as follows:
[bossiaea:R-devel-src]$ svn diff
Index: src/library/base/man/complex.Rd
===
--- src/library/base/man/complex.Rd (revision
Dear R developers,
after upgrading from R 2.1.1 to 2.2.0 I can't start csh (scripts) anymore.
While the following commands work fine
system(tcsh -c pwd)
/hom1/users/gloeckler
system(bash -c pwd)
/hom1/users/gloeckler
system(ksh -c pwd)
/hom1/users/gloeckler
csh (in contrast to
Andy,
that's interesting, but honestly your posting only *talked*
about your perceptions of bogous behavior of R and gave link to
a quite extensive S source file --- which re-defines basic
functions so it's not a file I'd just want to source into my R
session.
Proper R bug reports provide short
On 10/18/05, ernesto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
I think you are confusing us: xyplot is an S3 generic with no 'data'
argument. It is xyplot.formula that you want to add dispatch on its
'data' argument. I don't really see why you want to mix S3 and S4
systems,
Hi,
It does seem to be working as advertised, but not particulary
intuitively. From ?is.na
The generic function 'is.na-' sets elements to 'NA'
In fact:
xx - c(NA, 1)
is.na(xx) - 2
xx
[1] NA NA
or is.na(xx) - 5
[1] NA 1 NA NA NA
Looks like this was introduced in 1.4.0; from NEWS:
o
On Thu, 2005-10-20 at 01:13 +0100, Ted Harding wrote:
On 19-Oct-05 Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
In the following the first element of xx should have
been set to 0 but remains NA. Any comments?
xx - c(NA,1)
is.na(xx) - 0
xx
[1] NA 1
R.version.string # Windows XP
[1] R version
On 10/19/05, Marc Schwartz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2005-10-20 at 01:13 +0100, Ted Harding wrote:
On 19-Oct-05 Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
In the following the first element of xx should have
been set to 0 but remains NA. Any comments?
xx - c(NA,1)
is.na(xx) - 0
xx
On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 21:09 -0400, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
On 10/19/05, Marc Schwartz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2005-10-20 at 01:13 +0100, Ted Harding wrote:
On 19-Oct-05 Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
In the following the first element of xx should have
been set to 0 but remains
I have been told (off-list) that cross-compiling c++ no longer works.
Because of this, the c++ stuff is left out from the new tar ball.
And I have also been corrected: most of the work on the cross-
compiling tools were in fact done by Brian Ripley.
Kasper
On Oct 18, 2005, at 10:45 AM, A.J.
Hi Peter and everyone,
[Hmmm, didn't I say I was not really interested in spending time getting
into these discussions anymore? Oh well, I can't help myself. ;-) ]
Why would you want a GUI for something like R in the first
place? It is a programming language. That is its force. Nothing
beats
Though thanks to the obtuseness of the documentation, the makefile Jun
wrote has helped a great deal of folks.
While some have been appreciative, certain other folks have only
bothered to make snide, hostile remarks and not bothered to be polite
enough to suggest changes that might have prevented
11 matches
Mail list logo