MP == Mike Prager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Mon, 02 Jun 2008 16:29:16 -0400 writes:
MP Mike Prager [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was at a loss to understand the use of / until I looked in
An Introduction [!] to R, where I found the explanation.
My request is that more
To reply to my own message, that function wasn't quite right. I think
this one works better:
signif.string - function(signum,sigdigs){
test - abs(signum)
left - nchar(trunc(test))
right - nchar(test)-left-1
if (test1) {left-left-1}
if (right0) {right-0}
if (sigdigsleft)
I came to report this same bug and found it already in the trash, but
I slightly disagree with that assessment. If it's not a bug, then
perhaps it's a feature request. Comments at the end.
On Mon, May 14, 2007, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 13/05/2007 8:46 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the example
recently there was a post on R-help/Rd ?? with this link on benchmarking
different 'number crunching packages'. They used a series of tests,
although I didn't check they used all the types you mentioned. I couldn't
find test code at first glance but myyebe it is available on request???
Dear developers,
we develop our packages via r-forge and svn. Under R version 2.8.0 Under
development (unstable) (2008-06-02 r45826) I now observe the following
warning for our package distrEx
* checking for executable files ... WARNING
Found the following executable file(s):
Rather than transport quantities of the Introduction to R (a perfectly
sensible title for a very good starting point, IMHO) would it not be
simpler and involve less maintenance to include a link or
cross-reference in the 'formula' help page to the relevant part of the
Introduction? If nothing
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I came to report this same bug and found it already in the trash, but
I slightly disagree with that assessment. If it's not a bug, then
perhaps it's a feature request. Comments at the end.
On Mon, May 14, 2007, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 13/05/2007 8:46 PM, [EMAIL
S Ellison wrote:
Rather than transport quantities of the Introduction to R (a perfectly
sensible title for a very good starting point, IMHO) would it not be
simpler and involve less maintenance to include a link or
cross-reference in the 'formula' help page to the relevant part of the
On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 11:09:28AM -0400, Mark Kimpel wrote:
Dirk,
At the moment, our emphasis is getting an installation that will run Rmpi in
batch mode. I imagine my sysadmin put that line in to minimize potential
problems. To be honest, I didn't catch it, I was just glad to get a compile
Plaintive squeak: Why the change?
Some OS's and desktops use the extension, so forgetting it causes
trouble. The new default filename keeps a filetype (as before) but the
user now has to type a filetype twice (once as the type, once as
extension) to get the same effect fo rtheir own filenames.
Martin Maechler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Mike, you make very worthy suggestions; but I assume the word
request is really putting off almost all of us R corers.
You *have* heard that R is a volunteer project, that much of its
development has happened in unpaid time of core team mates.
Why
Dirk,
At the moment, our emphasis is getting an installation that will run Rmpi in
batch mode. I imagine my sysadmin put that line in to minimize potential
problems. To be honest, I didn't catch it, I was just glad to get a compile
:)
As to the line that doesn't apply to the R install, I think
On Jun 3, 2008, at 3:58 AM, Ludo Pagie wrote:
recently there was a post on R-help/Rd ?? with this link on
benchmarking different 'number crunching packages'. They used a
series of tests, although I didn't check they used all the types you
mentioned. I couldn't find test code at first
Not sure if this is sufficient but note that if you leave the filename
off entirely then the extension does default to the type.
savePlot() # wmf
savePlot(type = jpg)
args(savePlot)
function (filename = paste(Rplot, type, sep = .), type = c(wmf,
emf, png, jpg, jpeg, bmp, tif, tiff, ps,
On 6/3/2008 11:43 AM, Patrick Carr wrote:
On 6/3/08, Duncan Murdoch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
because signif(0.90, digits=2) == 0.9. Those two objects are identical.
My text above that is poorly worded. They're identical internally,
yes. But in terms of the number of significant digits, 0.9
On 6/3/2008 11:22 AM, S Ellison wrote:
Plaintive squeak: Why the change?
Some OS's and desktops use the extension, so forgetting it causes
trouble. The new default filename keeps a filetype (as before) but the
user now has to type a filetype twice (once as the type, once as
extension) to get
On Jun 3, 2008, at 2:48 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 6/3/2008 11:43 AM, Patrick Carr wrote:
On 6/3/08, Duncan Murdoch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
because signif(0.90, digits=2) == 0.9. Those two objects are
identical.
My text above that is poorly worded. They're identical internally,
yes.
On Jun 3, 2008, at 2:48 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 6/3/2008 11:43 AM, Patrick Carr wrote:
On 6/3/08, Duncan Murdoch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
because signif(0.90, digits=2) == 0.9. Those two objects are
identical.
My text above that is poorly worded. They're identical internally,
yes.
On 6/3/2008 4:36 PM, Simon Urbanek wrote:
On Jun 3, 2008, at 2:48 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 6/3/2008 11:43 AM, Patrick Carr wrote:
On 6/3/08, Duncan Murdoch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
because signif(0.90, digits=2) == 0.9. Those two objects are
identical.
My text above that is poorly
On 6/3/08, Duncan Murdoch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
because signif(0.90, digits=2) == 0.9. Those two objects are identical.
My text above that is poorly worded. They're identical internally,
yes. But in terms of the number of significant digits, 0.9 and 0.90
are different. And that matters
Dear R developers,
The following patch should fix a memory allocation bug:
Index: src/modules/internet/sockconn.c
===
--- src/modules/internet/sockconn.c (revision 45828)
+++ src/modules/internet/sockconn.c (working copy)
@@
On 6/3/08, Duncan Murdoch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's easy to make mistakes in this, but a little outside-of-R
experimentation suggests those are the right answers. The number 12345 is
exactly representable, so it is exactly half-way between 12340 and 12350, so
12340 is the right answer
On Jun 3, 2008, at 5:12 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 6/3/2008 4:36 PM, Simon Urbanek wrote:
On Jun 3, 2008, at 2:48 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 6/3/2008 11:43 AM, Patrick Carr wrote:
On 6/3/08, Duncan Murdoch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
because signif(0.90, digits=2) == 0.9. Those two
On Jun 3, 2008, at 5:12 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 6/3/2008 4:36 PM, Simon Urbanek wrote:
On Jun 3, 2008, at 2:48 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 6/3/2008 11:43 AM, Patrick Carr wrote:
On 6/3/08, Duncan Murdoch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
because signif(0.90, digits=2) == 0.9. Those two
On 6/3/2008 4:36 PM, Simon Urbanek wrote:
On Jun 3, 2008, at 2:48 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 6/3/2008 11:43 AM, Patrick Carr wrote:
On 6/3/08, Duncan Murdoch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
because signif(0.90, digits=2) == 0.9. Those two objects are
identical.
My text above that is poorly
Dirk,
Thanks for the helpful reply. I agree with the concept of testing an app
that is commonly used. I suppose someone who uses R to interface alot with a
database could have a very differnt experience that one who uses it mostly
for matrix manupulations.
Still, as a scientist I like to have
SU == Simon Urbanek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Tue, 3 Jun 2008 11:52:14 -0400 writes:
SU On Jun 3, 2008, at 3:58 AM, Ludo Pagie wrote:
recently there was a post on R-help/Rd ?? with this link
on benchmarking different 'number crunching
packages'. They used a series of tests,
On 03/06/2008 2:35 PM, Mike Prager wrote:
S Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Plaintive squeak: Why the change?
Some OS's and desktops use the extension, so forgetting it causes
trouble. The new default filename keeps a filetype (as before) but the
user now has to type a filetype twice (once
Thanks, once I get my new Intel installation running in tandem with a
gcc one, I'll report back. mark
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 7:04 PM, Martin Maechler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SU == Simon Urbanek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Tue, 3 Jun 2008 11:52:14 -0400 writes:
SU On Jun 3, 2008, at 3:58 AM,
On Jun 3, 2008, at 8:40 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 03/06/2008 2:35 PM, Mike Prager wrote:
S Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Plaintive squeak: Why the change?
Some OS's and desktops use the extension, so forgetting it causes
trouble. The new default filename keeps a filetype (as before)
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 10:36 PM, Simon Urbanek
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 3, 2008, at 8:40 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 03/06/2008 2:35 PM, Mike Prager wrote:
S Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Plaintive squeak: Why the change?
Some OS's and desktops use the extension, so forgetting
31 matches
Mail list logo
