Hi all.
pretty() is now generic in R-2.12 and there are new methods for Date
and POSIXt classes. These methods could potentially be used inside
axis.Date and axis.POSIXt (and Axis methods), although that has not
been decided yet.
The main advantage of the new method is that it is flexible, in th
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Assaf Gordon wrote:
> I've found this old thread:
> http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/R-in-a-sandbox-jail-td921991.html
> But for technical reasons I'd prefer not to setup a chroot jail.
>
I would also point out that the state of the art in the operating
system commun
On May 20, 2010, at 8:50 AM, Alex Bryant wrote:
> Does anyone know if it's possible to create a static build of R?
>
That depends heavily on the OS and tools used and has nothing to do with R
itself. You'll need static versions of all libraries you depend on and
compilers capable of using the
Hi,
I'd like to suggest that DESCRIPTION and/or NEWS files, or other
information revealing the version, would be added to the different
Rtools compilations (http://www.murdoch-sutherland.com/Rtools/).
Currently it's not easy to figure out which version is installed.
Another suggestion is to have
Is that class publicly available?
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
> Yes. I looked at that feature of zoo. But it forced me to keep track of
> fractional months in the "Date" world. Square one. I ended up implementing a
> class under the paradigm of whole and fractional mont
Yes. I looked at that feature of zoo. But it forced me to keep track of
fractional months in the "Date" world. Square one. I ended up implementing a
class under the paradigm of whole and fractional months. It allows me to do
all my time arithmetic in ways that accountants expect. For example,
accou
Does anyone know if it's possible to create a static build of R?
Thanks,
From: Alex Bryant
Sent: Monday, May 10, 2010 2:50 PM
To: 'r-devel@r-project.org'
Subject: Build R static
Hi, I am having trouble building R static on Solaris 5.10. I have a
requirement to run R within a specific user acco
I see, an interesting perspective.
The current purpose is just to look pretty, or to follow "the
principle of least surprise", which is difficult to the extent that it
is subjective and sometimes context dependent...
Cheers
-Felix
On 20 May 2010 17:38, Daniel Murphy wrote:
> Felix,
> I see your
Note that in the zoo package that as.Date.yearmon has a frac= argument, e.g.
> library(zoo)
> ym <- as.yearmon("2010-01")
> as.Date(ym, frac = 0.5)
[1] "2010-01-16"
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 9:56 PM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
>>Much better to implement directly what this is trying to do: i.e. to
>>hav
Le 20/05/10 09:40, Prof Brian Ripley a écrit :
On Thu, 20 May 2010, Romain Francois wrote:
Hello,
Thank you for these clear guidelines.
Given these subtleties, would it make sense to have a "configure.R"
that would win over configure and configure.win, and have R invoking
it correctly, as bel
On Thu, 20 May 2010, Romain Francois wrote:
Hello,
Thank you for these clear guidelines.
Given these subtleties, would it make sense to have a "configure.R" that
would win over configure and configure.win, and have R invoking it correctly,
as below ?
Only if someone in R-core volunteers to
Felix,
I see your point about the "halfway" point acting like the first day of the
month in its relativity to the ending date of the month: they're both
variable.
I'm an actuary. Like accountants, actuaries tend to measure "financial" time
in months because of how the books close. But in our math
Hello,
Thank you for these clear guidelines.
Given these subtleties, would it make sense to have a "configure.R" that
would win over configure and configure.win, and have R invoking it
correctly, as below ?
Romain
Le 20/05/10 08:51, Prof Brian Ripley a écrit :
We have seen problems with a
13 matches
Mail list logo