Hello,
`textConnection` prepares arguments for an internal function, and one of
these arguments is description that must be a character vector of length 1
(or so it seems).
Now the one and only argument you usually give to `textConnection` is
called object; from the code you can see how this
Kenn,
you might have had a point a while ago, but you may want to check most recent R
and re-evaluate:
?textConnection
[...]
object: character. A description of the connection. For an input
this is an R character vector object, and for an output
connection the name for
Hi,
I get the same error as mentioned in
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/error-in-memCompress-in-make-check-td3318922.html
I try to compile R 2.12.2 under Tinycore 3.5.1 running in VirtualBox 4.0.4.
Since first xz was not installed I must have used the internal version
which comes with the R
On Mon, 14 Mar 2011, Sigbert Klinke wrote:
Hi,
I get the same error as mentioned in
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/error-in-memCompress-in-make-check-td3318922.html
I try to compile R 2.12.2 under Tinycore 3.5.1 running in VirtualBox 4.0.4.
Since first xz was not installed I must have used
A recent question in r-help made me realize that I should add a drop1 method
for coxph and survreg. The default does not handle strata() or cluster()
properly.
However, for coxph the right options for the test argument would be
likelihood-ratio, score, and Wald; not chisq and F. All of
Dear Terry,
Possibly I'm missing something, but since the generic drop1() doesn't have a
test argument, why is there a problem?
args(drop1)
function (object, scope, ...)
If you use match.arg() against test, then the error message should be
informative if one of the prescribed values isn't
Dear R-devel,
There seems to be a discrepancy in the order in which lm and rlm evaluate their
arguments. This causes rlm to sometimes produce an error where lm is just fine.
Here is a little script that illustrate the issue:
library(MASS)
## create data
n - 100
dat -
On Mon, 2011-03-14 at 12:52 -0400, John Fox wrote:
Dear Terry,
Possibly I'm missing something, but since the generic drop1() doesn't have a
test argument, why is there a problem?
args(drop1)
function (object, scope, ...)
If you use match.arg() against test, then the error message
-Original Message-
From: r-devel-boun...@r-project.org
[mailto:r-devel-boun...@r-project.org] On Behalf Of Vadim Ogranovich
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 10:37 AM
To: 'r-devel@r-project.org'
Subject: [Rd] discrepancy between lm and MASS:rlm
Dear R-devel,
There seems to be a
Hi there,
Thanks, but I'm using R 2.12.2(2011-02-25) and ?textConnection says
everything you quoted except the last sentence ('object' should be the name
of a character vector: however, short expressions will be accepted provided
they deparse to less than 60 bytes.). Can it be that the help
Indeed! I added the drop.unused.levels argument and it now works. Thank you
Bill!
Here is a patch which one should use at one's own risk as it redefines
rlm.formula as global object, i.e. rlm.formula is no longer in the MASS
namespace and this is certainly not a good idea:
rlm.formula -
Is there any reason that rstandard.glm doesn't have a pearson option?
And if not, can it be added?
Background: I'm currently teaching an undergrad/grad-service course from
Agresti's Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis (2nd edn) and
deviance residuals are not used in the text. For now I'll
Hi there,
I am preparing a package based on Fortran 90 code. I've put the main code
is a MODULE, and I'm having several error messages with the linker:
R CMD SHLIB --output=mylib.so nrtype.f90 topbalmod.f90 runmodels.f90
The several error messages are related with the addition of an underscore
My apologies. I guess it would help if I tried the code more than once
before posting. That should have been:
rstandard.glm -
function(model,
infl=influence(model, do.coef=FALSE),
type=c(deviance, pearson), ...)
{
type - match.arg(type)
res - switch(type, pearson =
On Mar 14, 2011, at 22:25 , Brett Presnell wrote:
Is there any reason that rstandard.glm doesn't have a pearson option?
And if not, can it be added?
Probably... I have been wondering about that too. I'm even puzzled why it isn't
the default. Deviance residuals don't have quite the
Thanks Peter. I have just a couple of minor comments, and another
possible feature request, although it's one that I don't think will be
implemented.
peter dalgaard pda...@gmail.com writes:
On Mar 14, 2011, at 22:25 , Brett Presnell wrote:
Is there any reason that rstandard.glm doesn't
16 matches
Mail list logo
