Hi Dirk, thank you for the prompt response.
I have made the change and will re-upload to CRAN.
Irucka
On 2020-01-28 20:20, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 28 January 2020 at 19:47, EcoC2S - Irucka Embry wrote:
| Hi everyone, I am receiving the following NOTE when checking my
package
|
Hi Will,
Let's keep this on the mailing list.
On 1/13/20 16:00, William Chen wrote:
> Hi Herve,
>
> Thanks for this reply. I have been looking into the R CMD CHECK error
> that has been thrown by the tokay1 builder and am still unsure how to
> potentially mitigate the error message given.
>
On 28 January 2020 at 19:47, EcoC2S - Irucka Embry wrote:
| Hi everyone, I am receiving the following NOTE when checking my package
| 'iemisc':
|
| * checking top-level files ... NOTE
| Non-standard file/directory found at top level:
|'cran-comments.md'
|
| Will someone please tell me the
Hi everyone, I am receiving the following NOTE when checking my package
'iemisc':
* checking top-level files ... NOTE
Non-standard file/directory found at top level:
'cran-comments.md'
Will someone please tell me the correct location of cran-comments.md?
Thank you.
Irucka
--
Family
On 2020-01-28 05:13, Martin Maechler wrote:
Spencer Graves
on Mon, 27 Jan 2020 23:02:28 -0600 writes:
Still, as Abby mentioned, turning a simple function into the
default method of an S3 generic is easy to do, but comes with a
bit of cost, not just S3 dispatch which typically is
Hi,
I'm the developer of the package rSWeeP, and I'm trying to activate my
account at Bioconductor Git Credentials (
https://git.bioconductor.org/BiocCredentials/account_activation/)
and I keep receiving the message " danrle...@gmail.com is not associated
with a maintainer of a Bioconductor
We will be updating R-devel on the Bioconductor devel builders this afternoon
(malbec2 and tokay2). This may mean some intermittent download on the Single
Package Builder. It should not affect the build report for today. We
appreciate your understanding.
Lori Shepherd
Bioconductor Core
Yes, looks like a missing export (and a missing example on the help page, which
would have exposed the error...).
mrds:::integratepdf() should do the appropriate "burglary"
-pd
> On 28 Jan 2020, at 12:09 , Patrick Giraudoux
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Trying to use the function integratepdf of
Assume the object is backed by an HDF5 or Zarr array, for the sake of argument
and because that’s kind of how it works these days for many people. Also assume
the “SE*” may not actually be an SE, but rather some wacky subclass of SE.
If you return a new SE*, you need to copy all the metadata,
Hi,
Trying to use the function integratepdf of the mrds package, I get this
message:
|Error in integratepdf(fox.ds$ddf$ds$aux$ddfobj, select = rep(TRUE,
nrow(fox.ds$ddf$ds$aux$ddfobj$xmat)), : could not find function
"integratepdf" |
Has anyone already had this issue ? Maybe the function is
> Spencer Graves
> on Mon, 27 Jan 2020 23:02:28 -0600 writes:
> Thanks for the reply.
> On 2020-01-27 19:56, Abby Spurdle wrote:
>> Maybe I'm missing something really obvious here, but I was unable to
>> create a matrix out of POSIXct object(s).
>> Perhaps
Dear all,
Assume we have a SummarizedExperiment object `se` that contains raw count data,
and a method `doProcess` that processes the data to produce a matrix of
identical dimensions (for example log-transformation, normalisation,
imputation, ...). What are the opinions in favour or against
Whether something "is" a matrix depends on whether you listen to
is.matrix(x) or to inherits(x, "matrix"):
x = Sys.Date () + 1:16
y = as.POSIXct (x)
dim(y) = c(4,4)
is.matrix(y)
# [1] TRUE
inherits(y, "matrix")
# [1] FALSE
f = factor(letters[1:9])
dim(f) = c(3,3)
is.matrix(f)
# [1] TRUE
> > Maybe I'm missing something really obvious here, but I was unable to
> > create a matrix out of POSIXct object(s).
> > Perhaps that deserves a separate discussion...?
>Can you provide an example?
--
#date and time objects
x = Sys.Date () + 1:16
y = as.POSIXct (x)
#matrices
str
14 matches
Mail list logo
