On 31 January 2018 at 16:18, Barry Rowlingson
wrote:
>>
>
> Let the record also state that *gitlab* is an open source project and can be
> downloaded and self-hosted, like gogs, but unlike github.
Good to know. Nice one: https://github.com/gitlabhq/gitlabhq
Best,
-m
> PS I've been running a g
Dear Dr. Pfaff,
Thank you for this, creating a package out of single file was my
oriingal question, but not only creating and also maintaining it that
way so R package is an artifact of the development process rather than
"manually maintained" structure. I will have look at your sources.
Best,
M
losing business, that is _not_ such a big to any active project that
> is hosted there.
>
> Gabor
>
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 11:07 PM, Suzen, Mehmet
> wrote:
>> This might be off topic, but if R-core development ever moves to git,
>> I think it would make
This might be off topic, but if R-core development ever moves to git,
I think it would make sense to have its own git service hosted by a
university, rather than using
github or gitlab. It is possible via https://gogs.io/ project.
Just for the record.
Best,
-m
___
On 30 January 2018 at 21:31, Cook, Malcolm wrote:
>
> I think you want to see the approach to generating a skeleton from a single
> .R file presented in:
>
> Simple and sustainable R packaging using inlinedocs
> http://inlinedocs.r-forge.r-project.org/
>
> I have not used it in some time
systems to different time-series
representations, so richly democratised.
Many regards,
Mehmet
On 30 January 2018 at 17:00, Suzen, Mehmet wrote:
> Dear R developers,
>
> I am wondering what are the best practices for developing an R
> package. I am aware of Hadley Wickham's best
Dear R developers,
I am wondering what are the best practices for developing an R
package. I am aware of Hadley Wickham's best practice
documentation/book (http://r-pkgs.had.co.nz/). I recall a couple of
years ago there were some tools for generating a package out of a
single file, such as using
On 26 December 2017 at 00:00, Juan Telleria wrote:
> Maybe I'm new, and forgive my ignorance, but maybe in the future (~ X years
> from now) the R Project could be managed entirely from github, by doing
I strongly disagree. Are you aware that github is a commercial
company, github inc. [1] ?
What
On 30 November 2017 at 16:30, Iñaki Úcar wrote:
> If you really believe that references should be needed to know what to
> expect from a function call, then we work with different definitions
A behaviour of a function call might be quite complex depending on
the arguments characteristics, it may
On 30 Nov 2017 14:32, "Iñaki Úcar" wrote:
>>
>> Am I supposed to read every reference on a man page just to know what
>> to expect from a function?
>>
>
> If the reference is from John Chamber, you are supposed to read it.
As a joke, it's funny.
Not a joke. John Chambers is the authority in R
On 30 November 2017 at 14:04, Iñaki Úcar wrote:
>
> Am I supposed to read every reference on a man page just to know what
> to expect from a function?
>
If the reference is from John Chamber, you are supposed to read it.
It is not always possible for maintainers to document everything on a man pa
On 30 November 2017 at 11:37, Iñaki Úcar wrote:
> 2017-11-30 3:14 GMT+01:00 Suzen, Mehmet :
>> My understanding is that there is no inconsistency. `is` does what it
>> claims, from the documentation:
>>
>> ‘is’: With two arguments, tests whether ‘object’ can be t
On 29 November 2017 at 21:45, Hervé Pagès wrote:
> You're missing the point of my original post. Which is that
> there is a serious inconsistency between the unary and binary
> forms of is(). Maybe the binary form is right in case of
My understanding is that there is no inconsistency. `is` does w
ot entirely sure.
Best,
-Mehmet
On 29 November 2017 at 20:46, Hervé Pagès wrote:
> Hi Mehmet,
>
> On 11/29/2017 11:22 AM, Suzen, Mehmet wrote:
>>
>> Hi Herve,
>>
>> I think you are confusing subclasses and classes. There is no
>> contradiction. `is` documentat
Hi Herve,
I think you are confusing subclasses and classes. There is no
contradiction. `is` documentation
is very clear:
`With one argument, returns all the super-classes of this object's class.`
Note that object class is always `data.frame` here, check:
> class(data.frame())
[1] "data.frame"
>
On 13 September 2017 at 13:22, Brian G. Peterson wrote:
> I am not an official representative of the R team, so this is only my
> opinion.
>
Thank you.
> It seems to me that you are trying to create a solution to a problem
> which does not exist.
I am not trying to create any solution and not m
Dear Colleagues/Developers/R enthusiasts,
Would it be possible to develop a code of conduct (CoC) document for
R lists, CRAN submissions that all developers/maintainers to follow?
This may help all of us to better communicate and move forward together.
There is a similar effort from Python communi
It is not needed. There is a large community of developer using SparkR.
https://spark.apache.org/docs/latest/sparkr.html
It does exactly what you want.
On 3 September 2017 at 20:38, Juan Telleria wrote:
> Dear R Developers,
>
> I would like to suggest the creation of a new S4 object class for On-
Jennifer, Why do you try Sparkr?
https://spark.apache.org/docs/1.6.1/api/R/read.json.html
On 2 September 2017 at 23:15, Jennifer Lyon wrote:
> Thank you for your suggestion. Unfortunately, while R doesn't segfault
> calling readr::read_file() on the test file I described, I get the error
> messa
Not always, see what happens with lapply:
> x<-matrix(12,1,1)
> names(x)<-"one"
> y<-matrix(1,1,1)
> names(y)<-"one"
> dput(lapply(x,`+`,e2=y))
structure(list(one = structure(13, .Dim = c(1L, 1L))), .Names = "one")
>dput(lapply(x,`+`,e2=1))
structure(list(one = 13), .Names = "one")
Prof. Ripley h
On 9 March 2017 at 01:29, Arunkumar Srinivasan
wrote:
> The time info is lost on the first index as well. And it happens *silently*.
Yes, because it assumes homogeneous format on the entire vector. You
may want to
do two passes with different formats or run a regular expression to
catch typos.
There is no inconsistency. Documentation of `names` says "...value
should be a character vector of up to the same length as x..."
In the first definition your character vector is not the same length
as length of x, so you enforce NA by not defining value[2]
x <- 1:2
value<-c("a")
value[2]
[1] NA
On 16 June 2013 17:31, Gaurav Sehrawat wrote:
> fine the shared library path in it. And how would i
> verify it has been loaded. The library is dynamic i have check using
> ldd fpmpi.so
have you tried setting environment variable LD_LIBRARY_PATH:
http://tldp.org/HOWTO/Program-Library-HOWTO/shared
23 matches
Mail list logo
