... and they didn't make it through. I put the files in a gist:
https://gist.github.com/djvanderlaan/1e9beb75d2d595824efc
Jan
On 16-01-15 15:21, Jan van der Laan wrote:
Dirk,
The vagrant setup I use to test my packages with UBSAN also seems to
replicate the error reported by CRAN
Thanks Peter and Dan for your replies.
After learning a bit more about tcltk and environments etc. I have replaced
Try(n - evalq(TclVarCount - TclVarCount + 1, .TkRoot$env))
with
Try(n - .TkRoot$env$TclVarCount - .TkRoot$env$TclVarCount +1L)
as you suggest.
It now works for both R-3.1.1
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Michael Lawrence
lawrence.mich...@gene.com wrote:
Just wanted to start a discussion on whether R could ship with more
appropriate GC parameters.
I've been doing a number of similar measurements, and have come to the
same conclusion. R is currently very
Martin Morgan discussed this a year or so ago and as I recall bumped
up these values to the current defaults. I don't recall details about
why we didn't go higher -- maybe Martin does. I suspect the main
concern would be with small memory machines in student labs and less
developed countries. If
