Re: [Rd] R extension memory leak detection question

2021-04-05 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 5 April 2021 at 18:27, xiaoyan yu wrote: | Thank you all for your help. | We embedded R in our program and found the memory in the process | accumulated while our expectation is that the memory will go down after | each R evaluation. | I started to write a test program with only a few lines

[Rd] python-based examples within core-package help files

2021-04-05 Thread Abby Spurdle
I just noticed the following: (Within the help file for methods::is). supers <- extends("PythonInterface") superRelations <- extends("PythonInterface", fullInfo = TRUE) I was wondering: Could we please *not* have python-based examples within core help files. Furthermore, this example has no

Re: [Rd] R extension memory leak detection question

2021-04-05 Thread xiaoyan yu
Thank you all for your help. We embedded R in our program and found the memory in the process accumulated while our expectation is that the memory will go down after each R evaluation. I started to write a test program with only a few lines of R embedded codes and found the memory never went down

Re: [Rd] R extension memory leak detection question

2021-04-05 Thread xiaoyan yu
Thanks for your quick response. It is also surprising for us to notice the memory accumulation when running our program since it has been years since we developed our program. Here is the memory status I observed from 15384k to 234208k to 242024k without decreasing when running the test program.

[Bioc-devel] non-subsettable GRanges object

2021-04-05 Thread Oleksii Nikolaienko
Dear Bioc team, my package has started to fail during the build check ( http://bioconductor.org/checkResults/devel/bioc-LATEST/ramr/). I tried to figure out why and it appears that I somehow make GRanges object non-subsettable. Could anyone from "GenomicRanges" developers look at my issue and

Re: [Bioc-devel] non-subsettable GRanges object

2021-04-05 Thread Hervé Pagès
Hi Oleksii, It looks like we have a long-standing bug in the rbind() method for DataFrame objects that is somehow surfacing now. Here is a simple example: library(IRanges) DF1 <- DataFrame(A=I(list(11:12, 21:23))) DF2 <- DataFrame(A=IntegerList(31:34, 41:45, 51:56)) DF3 <- rbind(DF1,

[Bioc-devel] Updates to BiocFileCache, AnnotationHub, and ExperimentHub

2021-04-05 Thread Kern, Lori
We are in process of making some major updates to the caching in BiocFileCache, AnnotationHub, and ExperimentHub. Namely, the default caching location will change from using rappdirs::user_cache_dir to using tools::R_user_dir eventually relieving the dependency on rappdirs. To avoid

Re: [Bioc-devel] BFG cleanup on `spiky` repo (under submission)

2021-04-05 Thread Nitesh Turaga
Hi Tim, This package should be fixed now. I've synced your github repo with the one on git.bioconductor.org. Please check to make sure everything is as expected including the size. Best, Nitesh On 4/1/21, 6:22 AM, "Bioc-devel on behalf of Triche, Tim" wrote: Hi all,

Re: [Bioc-devel] non-subsettable GRanges object

2021-04-05 Thread Hervé Pagès
This is fixed in S4Vectors 0.29.13: https://github.com/Bioconductor/S4Vectors/commit/6d79932910af9618465d5f932df5864d0a270e11 This new version of S4Vectors should propagate to the build machines and become available via BiocManager::install() in the next 48h or so. Cheers, H. On 4/5/21 3:40

Re: [Bioc-devel] Adding new "DifferentialDNA3DStructure" to biocViews

2021-04-05 Thread Kern, Lori
DifferentialDNA3DStructure has been added to the devel list of biocViews terms and will be carried through in future releases. It will be available once biocViews version 1.59.3 propagates on the build system Cheers, Lori Shepherd Bioconductor Core Team Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer