[Bioc-devel] Request to reverse package deprecation (and support pushing changes)

Good afternoon: I'm the maintainer for the Bioconductor package "bigPint", located here . I've recently tried to push changes I made to resolve ERRORS in my package by the command " git push upstream devel". However, this has

Re: [Rd] c(NA, 0+1i) not the same as c(as.complex(NA), 0+1i)?

On 2023-11-09 3:13 am, Martin Maechler wrote: Mikael Jagan on Wed, 8 Nov 2023 11:13:18 -0500 writes: > So, to summarize, the open questions are: > (1) Should as.complex(NA_character_) give complex(r=NA_real_, i=0) > instead of NA_complex_? > (2) Should the first

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Warning from orphaned package on check page

I have volunteered to take over maintenance of plotrix. I should be submitting a version without the "orphaned" designation soon. (If anyone else would rather be maintainer, please get in touch with me offline.) Duncan Murdoch On 09/11/2023 9:47 a.m., Liam J. Revell wrote: Thank you

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Warning from orphaned package on check page

Thank you Georgi & Ivan for your comments. Because of the way 'plotrix' is written, it turns out to be very easy to copy the imported functions into a new source file in my package (let's say, plotrix_fn.R) and remove the dependency. What I've actually done is move 'plotrix' to Suggests, and

Re: [Rd] New syntax for positional-only function parameters?

Hi Mikko, > Given the prevalence of the issue, is this something that you would see as > worth pursuing for R? Could you give a little more detail on this, potentially with an example of the collisions you�re referring to (and maybe an example that throws an error and/or does something

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Warning from orphaned package on check page

Orphaned packages can't be listed in DEPENDS and IMPORTS fields in file DESCRIPTION. They can be in SUGGESTS but calls of functions from them should be guarded, eg with a message to install the offending package. In examples and tests the usage should be conditional on the package being

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Warning from orphaned package on check page

В Wed, 8 Nov 2023 21:50:46 -0500 "Liam J. Revell" пишет: > 'plotrix' is imported by well over 100 other CRAN packages, so I hope > it is not removed from CRAN. The CRAN team has already updated it once [1], fixing a number of Rd problems to ensure that it stays on CRAN for now and thus avoiding

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Warning from orphaned package on check page

My apologies for the lack of clarity. plotrix has been orphaned so my package results page now says     checking package dependencies ... WARNING     Requires orphaned package: ‘plotrix’ CRAN incoming requires maintainers to certify: 'I have fixed all problems shown on the package check

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Additional_packages in drat repositories

Le 09/11/2023 à 08:01, Claborne, Daniel via R-package-devel a écrit : I have a data package �pmartRdata� hosted in a drat repository here: https://github.com/pmartR/drat following the instructions here: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/drat/vignettes/DratStepByStep.html The package

Re: [R-pkg-devel] The problem with resubmitting the package to the Cran

On 08.11.2023 17:54, Karolina Marek wrote: Hello, I have the following case. I would like to resubmit a package to the Cran - per ARMA, which was archived on 2022-05-25, as it required the archived package 'matlab'. The new version of the 'matlab' was resubmitted to the Cran on 2022-06-01.

Re: [R-pkg-devel] The problem with resubmitting the package to the Cran

Dear Karolina, It means that you have an unexpected file or folder called "PARMA21del1_ident" inside your package. So either remove it or list it in a file called .Rbuildignore which you place at the root of the package folder. Best, Alex On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 at 09:57, Karolina Marek wrote: >

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Warning from orphaned package on check page

Dear Liam, I don't understand your question: if your package has plotrix listed as a dependency, it won't affect plotrix. Only the opposite would be true. Could you please clarify and indicate which package you are referring to? Thanks, Alex On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 at 09:57, Liam J. Revell wrote:

Re: [R-pkg-devel] The problem with resubmitting the package to the Cran

You'll need to fix that note before resubmitting. If you can share a link to a public repository, people in this list will likely be able to help. regards, Mark On 11/8/23 17:54, Karolina Marek wrote: Hello, I have the following case. I would like to resubmit a package to the Cran - per ARMA,

[R-pkg-devel] Additional_packages in drat repositories

I have a data package �pmartRdata� hosted in a drat repository here: https://github.com/pmartR/drat following the instructions here: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/drat/vignettes/DratStepByStep.html The package installs fine via install.packages(�pmartRdata�, repos =

[R-pkg-devel] Warning from orphaned package on check page

Dear colleagues. I'm trying to update a package on CRAN containing a dependency (specifically, on the popular graphing package 'plotrix') that has been orphaned because the maintainer is deceased. 'plotrix' is imported by well over 100 other CRAN packages, so I hope it is not removed from

[R-pkg-devel] The problem with resubmitting the package to the Cran

Hello, I have the following case. I would like to resubmit a package to the Cran - per ARMA, which was archived on 2022-05-25, as it required the archived package 'matlab'. The new version of the 'matlab' was resubmitted to the Cran on 2022-06-01. So we would like that our package will also

Re: [Rd] c(NA, 0+1i) not the same as c(as.complex(NA), 0+1i)?

> Mikael Jagan > on Wed, 8 Nov 2023 11:13:18 -0500 writes: > So, to summarize, the open questions are: > (1) Should as.complex(NA_character_) give complex(r=NA_real_, i=0) > instead of NA_complex_? > (2) Should the first argument in c(NA, x) and c(NA_integer_, x),