.
Unless you want to CHECK the package. In that case, you'll need
Suggests, too.
- Allen S. Rout
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
discuss this further? It seems counterintuitive to me.
I'd expect every package which my package code calls to be a dependency.
We're short of vocabulary for the true pedants here, because I could see
the vignettes being described as something my package calls, but I
don't mean that.
- Allen S
of work to be
done before you move to the new version, but you could give yourself
permission to rev it every.. what; year? Two?
ggplot2012? :)
- Allen S. Rout
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
to a growing taxonomy of
Depends-[system]:
- Allen S. Rout
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Greetings, and apologies for the braino leading to my first posting to
the general list. I'm reposting here, and changing how I attached the
files; they were hard to work with in the other post.
There's a coalescing group which is working to imitate Dirk's fine
translation of CRAN to APT, in
graph, run CHECK with
R_CHECK_FORCE_SUGGESTS=true.
Then the affected packages are checked. Perhaps this can be noted
with a signature.
Whew!
- Allen S. Rout
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r
nuisance.
- Allen S. Rout
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
, if there is some utility available from it. But I've got a
reputation as an overengineer, so..
In any case, I agree that the earlier check doesn't add anything
except possible satisfaction by the binary-package maintainers.
- Allen S. Rout
__
R-devel@r
On Sep 2, 2009, at 2:53 , Allen S. Rout wrote:
I'm working to automate the building of RPM packages for CRAN c.
In the process, I'm trying to get a sense of the correct
dependencies.
[...]
In other words, to check properly, I need to treat Suggests and
Imports as Depends.
[...]
So
was the initial itch I was trying to scratch, 'Depends' only on
R. But if I have to recursively expand according to these 'build
requires', I need 63 packages. And more painfully, I have to leave
CRAN and go grok Bioconductor. Yow.
So: does this seem silly, or is that just The Way It is?
- Allen S
://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.devel/4458/match=fifo+windows
My apologies for not just installing a windows box and trying it; I
don't own any licenses at the moment, and I kind of like it that
way. :)
It seemed like a doc clarification was in order, whichever way it went.
- Allen S
) or Fortran (which I just discovered today
uses //).
PERL ( . is concatenation ) would come just behind C and maybe Java
in that list. However, that doesn't materially damage
So it seems to me that defining addition of strings to be
concatenation is a reasonably widespread convention.
- Allen S
/browse/iff
http://webster.com/dictionary/iff
I'd figure if we can use it in Scrabble(tm), we can use it in
technical documentation.
- Allen S. Rout
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
.
- Allen S. Rout
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
be gentle if I've done dumb stuff.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
- Allen S. Rout
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
opinion on how that field ought to look? If the
Gods of R think that automated parsing of SystemRequirements is
unimportant, I'll have to maintain them by hand.
- Allen S. Rout
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r
to add the extra data to
PACKAGES, the current implementation would work, and I could just run
my hacked version and get at what I wanted. But I know of at least
one other package-heirarchy maintainer who might like this, and
subsuming it in the base function would be nice.
- Allen S. Rout
to me.
- Allen S. Rout
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 16:03:29 -0400, Duncan Murdoch [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I think there are mixed feelings about whether it is a feature or a
misfeature, but it's a very old property of the S language.
Oh well, understood. :)
- Allen S. Rout
of cycle
already conventional? This might be a Fine Manual question, but the
Writing R Extensions doc doesn't mention it.
- Allen S. Rout
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
20 matches
Mail list logo
