Re: [Rd] problem adding gdb to RTOOLS40 on Windows

2021-04-15 Thread Bravington, Mark (Data61, Hobart)
vington CSIRO Marine Lab Hobart Australia From: Avraham Adler Sent: Thursday, 15 April 2021 17:09 To: Voeten, C.C. Cc: Bravington, Mark (Data61, Hobart); R-Devel-2 Subject: Re: [Rd] problem adding gdb to RTOOLS40 on Windows Also, packages should be in

[Rd] problem adding gdb to RTOOLS40 on Windows

2021-04-14 Thread Bravington, Mark (Data61, Hobart)
I've not been able to install gdb for RTOOLS40 on Windows 10. The rtools installer (rtools40-x64_86.exe) doesn't seem to include gdb by default, and when I follow the instructions for adding gdb (which I tracked down at https://github.com/r-windows/docs/blob/master/faq.md) this is what

Re: [Rd] New pipe operator

2020-12-08 Thread Bravington, Mark (Data61, Hobart)
ld be great. cheers Mark Mark Bravington CSIRO Marine Lab Hobart Australia From: Duncan Murdoch Sent: Wednesday, 9 December 2020 09:28 To: Bravington, Mark (Data61, Hobart); Gabor Grothendieck; Gabriel Becker Cc: r-devel@r-project.org Subject: Re: [Rd] New pipe

Re: [Rd] New pipe operator

2020-12-08 Thread Bravington, Mark (Data61, Hobart)
> > On 06/12/2020 8:22 p.m., Bravington, Mark (Data61, Hobart) wrote: > (and Duncan Murdoch responded, as below) It still seems to me that placeholders are viable and unambiguous (only as things in RHS of pipes), and that something like x |> foo( _PIPE_) x |> bah( otherarg, _

Re: [Rd] New pipe operator

2020-12-06 Thread Bravington, Mark (Data61, Hobart)
Seems like this *could* be a good thing, and thanks to R core for considering it. But, FWIW: - I agree with Gabor G that consistency of "syntax" should be paramount here. Enough problems have been caused by earlier superficially-convenient non-standard features in R. In particular: --

Re: [Rd] missing binaries in R-devel windows snapshot 78175

2020-04-10 Thread Bravington, Mark (Data61, Hobart)
Martin Maechler Sent: Friday, 10 April 2020 17:49 To: Jeroen Ooms Cc: Bravington, Mark (Data61, Hobart); R-Devel-2 Subject: Re: [Rd] missing binaries in R-devel windows snapshot 78175 >>>>> Jeroen Ooms >>>>> on Fri, 10 Apr 2020 08:54:39 +0200 writes: > O

Re: [Rd] missing binaries in R-devel windows snapshot 78175

2020-04-09 Thread Bravington, Mark (Data61, Hobart)
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 12:44 PM Bravington, Mark (Data61, Hobart) > wrote: > > > > The "r-devel snapshot build" 78175 on Windows--- a dot-exe installer--- > > seems to be missing a couple of files in its bin/i386 folder: Rterm.exe and > > Rgui.exe

[Rd] missing binaries in R-devel windows snapshot 78175

2020-04-09 Thread Bravington, Mark (Data61, Hobart)
The "r-devel snapshot build" 78175 on Windows--- a dot-exe installer--- seems to be missing a couple of files in its bin/i386 folder: Rterm.exe and Rgui.exe. Both are present in its bin/x64 folder (and in the i386 folder for current R). NB the lack of i386/Rterm.exe affects even the x64