[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I define an S4 class ("B" in the example below) that directly extends
another ("A" in the example below) , which in turn directly extends another
("character" in the example below), I find that the slot does not have the
class I specified in setClass(), it has the unde
> R does not have a BIC S3 generic function: it is in package nlme!
> (There is one for S4 classes in package stats4.)
Sorry, I should have noticed that. Maybe my question should have been:
Since the stats package has generics for logLik and AIC, could it include
a generic for BIC?
Kevin Wright
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm using R 2.0.1.
I looked in the email archives but didn't see anything on this topic.
I've noticed a surprising (to me) difference between AIC and BIC:
methods("AIC")
[1] AIC.default* AIC.logLik*
methods("BIC")
[1] BIC.gls*BIC.lm* BIC.lme*BIC.lmList* BIC.lo
R does not have a BIC S3 generic function: it is in package nlme!
(There is one for S4 classes in package stats4.)
So this is a question for the nlme maintainer.
On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm using R 2.0.1.
I looked in the email archives but didn't see anything on this topic.
I'v
I'm using R 2.0.1.
I looked in the email archives but didn't see anything on this topic.
I've noticed a surprising (to me) difference between AIC and BIC:
> methods("AIC")
[1] AIC.default* AIC.logLik*
> methods("BIC")
[1] BIC.gls*BIC.lm* BIC.lme*BIC.lmList* BIC.logLik* BIC.nls*
Th
On Mon, 18 Apr 2005, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
Martin Maechler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
BDR> We could do better by insisting that "." was the decimal
BDR> point in all interval conversions _to_ numeric. Then the
BDR> effect of setting LC_NUMERIC would primarily be on
BDR> conversions
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Full_Name: Justin Bem
Version: 1.9.1
OS: Windows XP Home
Submission from: (NULL) (196.202.235.48)
I am a R new user !
I have writed procedure that i wantto transform as a package but with
RCMD build packageName [...]
I have 'sh' is not a recognized command in the dos promp
Full_Name: Justin Bem
Version: 1.9.1
OS: Windows XP Home
Submission from: (NULL) (196.202.235.48)
I am a R new user !
I have writed procedure that i wantto transform as a package but with
RCMD build packageName [...]
I have 'sh' is not a recognized command in the dos promp I have Active Perl 5.
Martin Maechler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> BDR> We could do better by insisting that "." was the decimal
> BDR> point in all interval conversions _to_ numeric. Then the
> BDR> effect of setting LC_NUMERIC would primarily be on
> BDR> conversions _from_ numeric, especially printi
> "BDR" == Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> on Sun, 17 Apr 2005 12:38:10 +0100 (BST) writes:
BDR> These are some points stimulated by reading about C history (and
BDR> related in their implementation).
<.>
BDR> 2) R does not have integer constants. It wo
> "Duncan" == Duncan Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> on Mon, 18 Apr 2005 03:33:42 -0400 (EDT) writes:
>> On Sun, 17 Apr 2005, Jan T. Kim wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 12:38:10PM +0100, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
These are some points stimulated by reading abou
> Sorry about the mistake in the previous post, here is the corrected
> version:
And I've just added responses to part of it:
> (3) The above model lacks something like an 'environment' for the pointer
> to
> the C++ object to live in it. Assume we create the foo class in R like:
>
> obj <- fo
> On 18 Apr 2005 11:18:03 +0200,
> Peter Dalgaard (PD) wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> Full_Name: Jari Oksanen
>> Version: 2.0.1, 2.1.0 beta (2005-04-17)
>> OS: Linux
>> Submission from: (NULL) (130.231.102.145)
>>
>>
>> If name ends with "and", such as "Roeland Las
> On 18 Apr 2005 11:18:03 +0200,
> Peter Dalgaard (PD) wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> Full_Name: Jari Oksanen
>> Version: 2.0.1, 2.1.0 beta (2005-04-17)
>> OS: Linux
>> Submission from: (NULL) (130.231.102.145)
>>
>>
>> If name ends with "and", such as "Roeland Las
On Mon, 18 Apr 2005, Ali - wrote:
I am trying to wrap some C++ classes into R.
(1) Comparing the OOP and methods packages, I have came to this conclusion
that OOP works much better for this wrapper -- please correct me if I am
wrong. One question is why this useful package (OOP) is not included i
Sorry about the mistake in the previous post, here is the corrected version:
Hello
I am trying to wrap some C++ classes into R.
(1) Comparing the OOP and methods packages, I have came to this conclusion
that OOP works much better for this wrapper -- please correct me if I am
wrong. One question is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Full_Name: Jari Oksanen
> Version: 2.0.1, 2.1.0 beta (2005-04-17)
> OS: Linux
> Submission from: (NULL) (130.231.102.145)
>
>
> If name ends with "and", such as "Roeland Lastname", citation() will chop
> "and"
> as a separate word giving "Roel and Lastname". This is
> Hello
>
> I am trying to wrap some C++ classes into R.
>
> (1) Comparing the OOP and methods packages, I have came to this conclusion
> that OOP works much better for this wrapper -- please correct me if I am
> wrong.
The methods package using a different conceptual model of object-oriented
prog
Dear ESS users, {BCC'ed to RPM and Debian maintainers of ESS}
We have now released ESS 5.2.7. This is a bug fix release against 5.2.6
where - the new UTF-8 "support" gave problems for Xemacs, and
- accidentally, 'auto-fill-mode' was activated for *.R buffers
with a few new features, see
Full_Name: Jari Oksanen
Version: 2.0.1, 2.1.0 beta (2005-04-17)
OS: Linux
Submission from: (NULL) (130.231.102.145)
If name ends with "and", such as "Roeland Lastname", citation() will chop "and"
as a separate word giving "Roel and Lastname". This is the case in the upcoming
release of vegan (1.6
> On Sun, 17 Apr 2005, Jan T. Kim wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 12:38:10PM +0100, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
>>> These are some points stimulated by reading about C history (and
>>> related in their implementation).
>>>
>>>
>>> 1) On some platforms
>>>
as.integer("0xA")
>>> [1] 10
>>>
>>>
Hello
I am trying to wrap some C++ classes into R.
(1) Comparing the OOP and methods packages, I have came to this conclusion
that OOP works much better for this wrapper -- please correct me if I am
wrong. One question is why this useful package (OOP) is not included in the
official release of R
22 matches
Mail list logo
