Update Ggobi and Rggobi in Debian (Was: [Rd] R-2.0.1 and Rggobi)

2004-11-25 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 08:32:21AM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 07:14:10AM +0100, A.J. Rossini wrote: > > Brian is correct regarding the lists, but note that Rggobi 1.1 works > > for me (Duncan T-L sent me the following link which worked for me on > > an old R-H or SuSE

Re: [Rd] R-2.0.1 and Rggobi

2004-11-24 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 07:14:10AM +0100, A.J. Rossini wrote: > Brian is correct regarding the lists, but note that Rggobi 1.1 works > for me (Duncan T-L sent me the following link which worked for me on > an old R-H or SuSE system (sorry Dirk! not had a chance to change it > yet...). > > " Try t

Re: [Rd] R-2.0.1 and Rggobi

2004-11-23 Thread Richard Beare
OK, last posting on this thread - the combinations I have tried and the results are ggobi Rggobi Result 1.0-1-beta 1.1-0segfault 1.0-1-beta 1.1-1segfault 1.0-0-beta 1.1-0segfault 1.0-0-beta 1.1-1segfault 1.0-0 1.1-0segfault 1.0-0

Re: [Rd] R-2.0.1 and Rggobi

2004-11-23 Thread A.J. Rossini
Brian is correct regarding the lists, but note that Rggobi 1.1 works for me (Duncan T-L sent me the following link which worked for me on an old R-H or SuSE system (sorry Dirk! not had a chance to change it yet...). " Try the tar file at http://www.ggobi.org/Download/Rggobi_1.1-0.tar.gz " be

Re: [Rd] R-2.0.1 and Rggobi

2004-11-23 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
Please note that is not the correct fix. From the ONEWS in 2.0.1: o The undocumented C-level entry point R_IsNaNorNA has been removed. It was used in a couple of packages, and should be replaced by a call to the documented macro ISNAN. The ggobi list are now operational agai

Re: [Rd] R-2.0.1 and Rggobi

2004-11-23 Thread Richard Beare
Hi, Thanks for that - I attempted to install the earlier versions I had been successful with before - Rggobi 1.0.0 and ggobi 1.0.0-beta. The R side of things wouldn't compile out of the box due to a change in the R_IsNaNorNA function. This caused a problem in RSGgobi.c, which I fixed by adding

Re: [Rd] R-2.0.1 and Rggobi

2004-11-23 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Richard, On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 01:54:36PM +1100, Richard Beare wrote: > Hi, > I've had no luck with the combination of R-2.0.1 and Rggobi/gobi (1.1-1 > and 1.0-1 beta). I've tried a default configuration of ggobi, as well > as one with all the plugins enabled. I'm using RedHat 9 Linux. > > T

[Rd] R-2.0.1 and Rggobi

2004-11-23 Thread Richard Beare
Hi, I've had no luck with the combination of R-2.0.1 and Rggobi/gobi (1.1-1 and 1.0-1 beta). I've tried a default configuration of ggobi, as well as one with all the plugins enabled. I'm using RedHat 9 Linux. The problem I'm experiencing is a segmentation fault when library.dynam is called fro