Re: [Rd] warning from return() in 1.8 but not in 1.7.0 (PR#4687)

2003-10-21 Thread Tord Snall
Dear Duncan, At 19:58 2003-10-20 -0400, you wrote: >On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 18:50:22 +0200 (MET DST), you wrote: > > >>I have read CHANGES and can't find changes about return(). > >CHANGES is the list of Windows-specific changes. It says this right >at the top (and says that NEWS is for other version

[Rd] Console in RGui does not do CR on \r (PR#4705)

2003-10-21 Thread david . lenn
Full_Name: David Lennartsson Version: 1.7.1, 1.8.0 OS: Windows XP Submission from: (NULL) (62.119.45.80) A very minor bug, but here it comes. On doing something as simple as cat("1st test string\r2nd\n") the console in RGui on Windows do not perform a CR on '\r'. This is very annoying if you for

Re: [Rd] Console in RGui does not do CR on \r (PR#4705)

2003-10-21 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
Not a bug, but intentional. To be a bug, it would need to be documented to work, and it is not. In Rgui other threads (e.g. a tcltk button) can be writing to the console too. Implementing \r would be very complicated, and not worthwhile (Windows has a perfectly good progress-meter widget!) O

Re: [Rd] Problem R-1.8.0 library tcltk on Tcl-8.0.5 (PR#4699)

2003-10-21 Thread Kurt Hornik
> Peter Dalgaard writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >> Full_Name: Eiji Nakama >> Version: R-1.8.0 >> OS: linux(VineLinux) >> Submission from: (NULL) (219.117.236.13) >> >> >> I build by Tcl8.0.5 and R-1.8.0. >> >> > library(tcltk) >> Error in dyn.load(x, as.logical(local), as.logical(now))

Re: [Rd] Problem R-1.8.0 library tcltk on Tcl-8.0.5 (PR#4699)

2003-10-21 Thread Peter Dalgaard
Kurt Hornik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > (Argh. The test builds of 1.8.0 were actually against tcl8.0, but > > apparently our testing procedures skip any attempt to load the dynlib. > > Automated tests of tcl/tk are difficult because Tk will protest if > > there is no X display.) > > On syste

[Rd] R1.8.0 and virtual PC (PR#4708)

2003-10-21 Thread lbagua
Dear Sir/Madam First, I should tell that I'm using virtual PC "w2k" in a mac osx 10.2. The problem: I recently downloaded the windows version 1.8.0. I found the following problem with the instruction plot. E.g., if I type the following instructions, I got the following error message: > x = 1:

[Rd] an r-devel change related to attributes

2003-10-21 Thread Douglas Bates
We have made a change in r-devel involving copying during assignment of attributes. The only effect should be better performance in packages that use S4 classes and methods. However, if you are using r-devel you should be watch for peculiar errors related to attributes. _

[Rd] round behaves differently from ceiling, floor for matrices with 0 rows (PR#4710)

2003-10-21 Thread w . huber
Full_Name: Wolfgang Huber Version: 1.8.0 OS: Linux Submission from: (NULL) (193.174.58.146) base::round converts a matrix with 0 rows into numeric(0), while floor and ceiling return a matrix of the same size: > round(matrix(0, nrow=0, ncol=3)) numeric(0) > ceiling(matrix(0, nrow=0, ncol=3))

Re: [Rd] R1.8.0 and virtual PC (PR#4708)

2003-10-21 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 19:25:49 +0200 (MET DST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote : >Dear Sir/Madam > >First, I should tell that I'm using virtual PC "w2k" in a mac osx 10.2. > >The problem: I recently downloaded the windows version 1.8.0. I found >the following problem with the instruction plot. >E.g., if I

Re: [Rd] R1.8.0 and virtual PC (PR#4708)

2003-10-21 Thread Thomas Lumley
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Dear Sir/Madam > > First, I should tell that I'm using virtual PC "w2k" in a mac osx 10.2. > It would probably be easier (and faster) to use RAqua in OS X, rather than the windows version under virtual PC. -thomas __

[Rd] Subsetted 1-D arrays (PR#4110)

2003-10-21 Thread David Brahm
In R-patched_2003-10-20, subsetted 1-D arrays no longer get converted to vectors. The NEWS file documents this change, as an indirect result of bug report 4110. I just wanted to mention this can break code in some rather obscure ways, such as this toy example: R> x <- sort(tapply(1:8, rep(1:4,

Re: [Rd] Subsetted 1-D arrays (PR#4110)

2003-10-21 Thread Peter Dalgaard
David Brahm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In R-patched_2003-10-20, subsetted 1-D arrays no longer get converted to > vectors. The NEWS file documents this change, as an indirect result of bug > report 4110. I just wanted to mention this can break code in some rather > obscure ways, such as this

Re: [Rd] Subsetted 1-D arrays (PR#4110)

2003-10-21 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, David Brahm wrote: > In R-patched_2003-10-20, subsetted 1-D arrays no longer get converted to > vectors. The NEWS file documents this change, as an indirect result of bug > report 4110. I just wanted to mention this can break code in some rather > obscure ways, such as this