[Rd] single assignment affecting multiple sub-structures (PR#7924)

2005-06-09 Thread tplate
I'm trying to create a language structure that is a call to a function with a number of arguments that is only known at run time. I do this by using repeated indices to expand out a call with a single argument. However, when I change one of the arguments, all are changed. I don't see the same

Re: [Rd] Suggestion: help()

2005-06-09 Thread Duncan Murdoch
> On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Duncan Murdoch wrote: > > [...] > > >>My proposal (modified following the suggestions I've heard so far) is as >>follows: >> >> - to check that a couple of help topic aliases exist (.package >>and ) >> - to recommend that .package contain general information about >>the pac

[Rd] NEWS, WISHLIST, THANKS

2005-06-09 Thread Gabor Grothendieck
I have NEWS, WISHLIST and THANKS files in the 'dyn' package in the same directory as the DESCRIPTION file but I noticed that they did not survive the move to CRAN, at least on Windows. How do I incorporate them so that they are not omitted? __ R-devel@st

RE: [Rd] NEWS, WISHLIST, THANKS

2005-06-09 Thread Liaw, Andy
Things not required to be there needs to be placed in inst/, so they will make it into the binary package. This is where I had to put the NEWS file for my package, as I learned here a while ago. Andy > From: Gabor Grothendieck > > I have NEWS, WISHLIST and THANKS files in the 'dyn' package > in

Re: [Rd] NEWS, WISHLIST, THANKS

2005-06-09 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 6/9/2005 3:41 PM, Gabor Grothendieck wrote: I have NEWS, WISHLIST and THANKS files in the 'dyn' package in the same directory as the DESCRIPTION file but I noticed that they did not survive the move to CRAN, at least on Windows. How do I incorporate them so that they are not omitted? The R e

Re: [Rd] NEWS, WISHLIST, THANKS

2005-06-09 Thread Achim Zeileis
On Thu, 9 Jun 2005 15:41:32 -0400 Gabor Grothendieck wrote: > I have NEWS, WISHLIST and THANKS files in the 'dyn' package > in the same directory as the DESCRIPTION file but I noticed that they > did not survive the move to CRAN, at least on Windows. Moving to CRAN per se has nothing to do with t

Re: [Rd] NEWS, WISHLIST, THANKS

2005-06-09 Thread Gabor Grothendieck
On 6/9/05, Achim Zeileis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 9 Jun 2005 15:41:32 -0400 Gabor Grothendieck wrote: > > > I have NEWS, WISHLIST and THANKS files in the 'dyn' package > > in the same directory as the DESCRIPTION file but I noticed that they > > did not survive the move to CRAN, at lea

Re: [Rd] NEWS, WISHLIST, THANKS

2005-06-09 Thread Gabor Grothendieck
On 6/9/05, Achim Zeileis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 9 Jun 2005 15:41:32 -0400 Gabor Grothendieck wrote: > > Moving to CRAN per se has nothing to do with this. If the files have > been in the source package you submitted (they have been, including a > safety copy DESCRIPTION~ which you m

RE: [Rd] NEWS, WISHLIST, THANKS

2005-06-09 Thread Liaw, Andy
R CMD build ignores files that it thinks does not belong to the source package (basically files that it does not know about). I believe that's the point made in R-exts. Andy > From: Gabor Grothendieck > > On 6/9/05, Achim Zeileis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, 9 Jun 2005 15:41:32 -040

[Rd] Question about .Rd syntax

2005-06-09 Thread Philippe Grosjean
Hello all, In one of my packages, I have the following warning with R-devel, but no problems with R 2.1.0, or R patched: ** checking Rd \usage sections ... WARNING Bad \usage lines found in documentation object 'guiStart': guiStart(gui = "\" Functions with \usage entries need to have the app

Re: [Rd] Question about .Rd syntax

2005-06-09 Thread Kurt Hornik
> Philippe Grosjean writes: > Hello all, > In one of my packages, I have the following warning with R-devel, but no > problems with R 2.1.0, or R patched: > ** checking Rd \usage sections ... WARNING > Bad \usage lines found in documentation object 'guiStart': >guiStart(gui = "\" > Func

Re: [Rd] Suggestion: help()

2005-06-09 Thread Kurt Hornik
> Duncan Murdoch writes: >>> > On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Duncan Murdoch wrote: >>> > >>> > [...] >>> > >>> > >>> >>My proposal (modified following the suggestions I've heard so far) is as >>> >>follows: >>> >> >>> >> - to check that a couple of help topic aliases exist (.package >>> >>and ) >>> >>