Thanks for all the suggestions. However, I was not really looking for a
solution but I want to propose this (in my view useful) change to be
included in a future version of R. For the time being I will include a
modified version in my package.
Best regards,
Andreas
--
Andreas Borg
H C Pumphrey wrote:
I'm trying to fix a subtle bug in the hdf5 package. This package
provides an interfaces to the HDF5 library and hence allows one to load
data into R from files in the HDF5 format. The bug appeared during a
period in which R changed but the package did not. [details
On 03/16/2011 05:43 PM, Max Kuhn wrote:
Web page and svn, but you probably already know this.
Thanks a lot for the note. This is due to a network system failure at
WU. From the intranet we cannot connect to services outside and vice
versa. I hope the guys at IT services will fix this soon.
Hello,
When running tools::checkRd() on a single .Rd file, should I expect the
output to be the same as that generated by R CMD check when it checks .Rd
files?
R CMD check finds the following warning:
* checking Rd \usage sections ... WARNING
Assignments in \usage in documentation object
Hi Peter and others,
If it helps, I wrote a small function glm.scoretest() for the statmod
package on CRAN to compute score tests from glm fits. The score test for
adding a covariate, or any set of covariates, can be extracted very neatly
from the standard glm output, although you probably
One can easily test for the binary case and not give the statistic in that case.
A general point is that if one gave no output that was not open to abuse,
there'd be nothing given at all! One would not be giving any output at all
from poisson or binomial models, given that data that really calls
Hi,
I came across the following warning in R CMD check (it only occurred on
Windows):
The \usage entries for S3 methods should use the \method markup and not
their full name.
See the chapter 'Writing R documentation files' in manual 'Writing R
Extensions'.
The package I'm looking at is one
