[R] ATT Researchers and the New York Times

2009-01-10 Thread Alan Zaslavsky
I've submitted a posting to the NY Times blog mentioned by David Smith, specifically mentioning John, Rick and Allan. (Now awaiting moderation.) Of course there are many others deserving credit but far to numerous to list so I didn't get started. On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Robert

Re: [R] ATT Researchers and the New York Times

2009-01-09 Thread Roland Studer
I agree, that there are better plattforms. I'd love to see something like Stack Overflow: http://stackoverflow.com/ When you type your question, it compares it to previously answered questions. Answers can get voted up and down. Answers AND questions can be edited! Regards Roland Studer On

Re: [R] ATT Researchers and the New York Times

2009-01-09 Thread Dr Eberhard W Lisse
No problem, easy peasy, just hack it together and put all the old archives on so the subscribers can vote. greetings, el On 09 Jan 2009, at 14:45 , Roland Studer wrote: I agree, that there are better plattforms. I'd love to see something like Stack Overflow: http://stackoverflow.com/ When

[R] ATT Researchers and the New York Times

2009-01-09 Thread Gábor Csárdi
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Roland Studer roland.stu...@gmail.com wrote: I agree, that there are better plattforms. I'd love to see something like Stack Overflow: http://stackoverflow.com/ Why, you cannot see it now? You can start posting your R questions and answers to it right away if

Re: [R] ATT Researchers and the New York Times

2009-01-09 Thread Ajay ohri
R would have truly arrived if the Wall Street Journal mentions it as an alternative to SAS or Excel...but that is some years away... Ajay www.decisionstats.com On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 7:28 AM, Robert Wilkins irishhac...@gmail.comwrote: Is anyone in the leadership of the R-project going to

Re: [R] ATT Researchers and the New York Times

2009-01-09 Thread David M Smith
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Robert Wilkins irishhac...@gmail.comwrote: Is anyone in the leadership of the R-project going to contact the New York Times and clarify that the article gave remarkably short shrift to the people who designed the user interface for R, to a large extent ATT

[R] ATT Researchers and the New York Times

2009-01-08 Thread Robert Wilkins
Is anyone in the leadership of the R-project going to contact the New York Times and clarify that the article gave remarkably short shrift to the people who designed the user interface for R, to a large extent ATT researchers from an earlier generation? It would be the appropriate thing to do.

Re: [R] ATT Researchers and the New York Times

2009-01-08 Thread stephen sefick
It has worked wonders for me over the last years. It clunkily and reliably delivers messages to my inbox that are either someone elses question about R or an answer to one of my questions. clunkily yours Stephen Sefick On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Robert Wilkins irishhac...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: [R] ATT Researchers and the New York Times

2009-01-08 Thread Johannes Huesing
stephen sefick ssef...@gmail.com [Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 03:16:11AM CET]: It has worked wonders for me over the last years. On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Robert Wilkins irishhac...@gmail.com wrote: And by the way, ARE YOU GUYS EVER GOING TO FIX your mailing list platform? It is extremely

Re: [R] ATT Researchers and the New York Times

2009-01-08 Thread Dr Eberhard W Lisse
Robert, go ahead, fix whatever bothers you, this is Open Sauce, not Jet-Engine Science :-)-O el On 09 Jan 2009, at 07:41 , Johannes Huesing wrote: stephen sefick ssef...@gmail.com [Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 03:16:11AM CET]: It has worked wonders for me over the last years. On Thu, Jan 8,