Re: [R] DESeq vs DESeq2 different DEGs results

2014-05-09 Thread Arunkumar Srinivasan
You're on the wrong list. This is more appropriate on the bioconductor mailing list. On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 9:42 AM, Catalina Aguilar Hurtado cata...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, I want to compare DESeq vs DESeq2 and I am getting different number of DEGs which I will expect to be normal. However,

[R] DESeq vs DESeq2 different DEGs results

2014-05-05 Thread Catalina Aguilar Hurtado
Hi, I want to compare DESeq vs DESeq2 and I am getting different number of DEGs which I will expect to be normal. However, when I compare the 149 genes ID that I get with DESeq with the 869 from DESeq2 there are only ~10 genes that are in common which I don’t understand (using FDR 0.05 for

[R] DESeq package install error

2012-03-06 Thread nathalie
HI, I would like to update my DESeq package version on R-2-14 using bioclite() and get this message, could somebody help please? biocLite(DESeq) BioC_mirror: 'http://www.bioconductor.org' Using R version 2.14, BiocInstaller version 1.2.1. Installing package(s) 'DESeq' Installing package(s)

Re: [R] DESeq package install error

2012-03-06 Thread Martin Morgan
On 03/06/2012 02:20 AM, nathalie wrote: HI, I would like to update my DESeq package version on R-2-14 using bioclite() and get this message, could somebody help please? biocLite(DESeq) BioC_mirror: 'http://www.bioconductor.org' Using R version 2.14, BiocInstaller version 1.2.1. Installing

[R] DESeq

2011-11-07 Thread Eric
Hello, I have RNAseq data, which I am trying to analyze with DESeq. My file (tab delimited .txt) appears to be correct: head(myfile) VZ_w13 VZ_w14a VZ_w14b VZ_w15a VZ_w15b VZ_w16a ENSG0253101 0 0 0 0 0 0 ENSG0223972 0

Re: [R] DESeq

2011-11-07 Thread R. Michael Weylandt
This is one of those quirky R moments, try something like as.integer(as.character(DATA)). Michael On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Eric v_cand...@hotmail.com wrote: Hello, I have RNAseq data, which I am trying to analyze with DESeq. My file (tab delimited .txt) appears to be correct: