[R] Fortunes - was Re: [OT] vernacular names for circular diagrams

Gabor Grothendieck [EMAIL PROTECTED] 29/01/2008 12:35:27 As is common in human affairs, even the illusion of understanding is preferred to a lofty digression upon why the audience does not understand. Gabor, This should be in fortunes; it is depressingly accurate. But it doesn't have to be

Re: [R] Fortunes - was Re: [OT] vernacular names for circular diagrams

I did not write that. On Jan 29, 2008 9:05 AM, S Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gabor Grothendieck [EMAIL PROTECTED] 29/01/2008 12:35:27 As is common in human affairs, even the illusion of understanding is preferred to a lofty digression upon why the audience does not understand.

Re: [R] Fortunes - was Re: [OT] vernacular names for circular diagrams

Search the archives and find who posted it. On Jan 29, 2008 1:52 PM, John Kane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Any idea who did? I have it in my list of quotes and attributed to you. Anon is so boring as a source. --- Gabor Grothendieck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I did not write that. On

Re: [R] Fortunes - was Re: [OT] vernacular names for circular diagrams

Any idea who did? I have it in my list of quotes and attributed to you. Anon is so boring as a source. --- Gabor Grothendieck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I did not write that. On Jan 29, 2008 9:05 AM, S Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gabor Grothendieck [EMAIL PROTECTED] 29/01/2008