Hi
I got a dataset
loss max.loss grp
1 10 50 2
2 15 33 1
3 18 49 2
4 33 38 1
5 8 50 3
6 19 29 1
7 22 51 4
8 50 50
I think you are off-track because max.loss does not sound like a
proper Y variable. Because max.loss is an amount that is known, in the
insurance applications I have seen it would have been modeled within
an offset term. Many of the examples have used number of ships or
buildings or the
Actually both max.loss and loss are known values (in dollars). I'm very much
doubt, what to choose.
glm(max.loss~loss,family=gaussian(link=identity)
or
glm(formula = sum ~ claims * as.factor(grp), family = gaussian(link =
identity))
or
glm(loss~max.loss,family=gaussian(link=identity)
we
Although both are known now, there is a time element involved in
which one, max.loss was fixed at the time of underwriting and loss was
unknown at that time. This *is* an insurance question is it not?
Wouldn't the question be: Can one use the group variable to estimate
the proportion of
4 matches
Mail list logo