[R] intervals {nlme} lower CI greater than upper CI !!!????

2011-02-08 Thread Federico Bonofiglio
Hi folks... check this out.. GLU-lme(gluc~rt*cd4+sex+age+rf+nadir+pharmac+factor(hcv)+factor(hbs)+ + haartd+hivdur+factor(arv), + random= ~rt|id, na.action=na.omit) intervals(GLU)$fixed lower est. upper (Intercept) 67.3467070345 7.362307e+01

Re: [R] intervals {nlme} lower CI greater than upper CI !!!????

2011-02-08 Thread David Winsemius
On Feb 8, 2011, at 4:14 PM, Federico Bonofiglio wrote: Hi folks... check this out.. GLU-lme(gluc~rt*cd4+sex+age+rf+nadir+pharmac+factor(hcv) +factor(hbs)+ + haartd+hivdur+factor(arv), + random= ~rt|id, na.action=na.omit) intervals(GLU)$fixed lower est.

Re: [R] intervals {nlme} lower CI greater than upper CI !!!????

2011-02-08 Thread Eik Vettorazzi
Hi, there is nothing to complain?! 0.0148 6.24e-02=0.0624 1.1e-01 = 0.11 same for the 5th line. so I didn't get the point. Am 08.02.2011 22:14, schrieb Federico Bonofiglio: Hi folks... check this out.. GLU-lme(gluc~rt*cd4+sex+age+rf+nadir+pharmac+factor(hcv)+factor(hbs)+ +

Re: [R] intervals {nlme} lower CI greater than upper CI !!!????

2011-02-08 Thread Ben Bolker
Federico Bonofiglio bonoricus at gmail.com writes: You're confused by the formatting differences betwen columns. The first column uses 'standard' notation, the second and third use 'scientific' notation -- see comments inline.