On 23 Sep 2015, at 02:33 , Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> I don't see why this puzzles you. A simple explanation is that Urkund
> is incompetent.
That much I figured. What I was puzzled about was _how_ it was being
incompetent. Also how it could be so in a way that
Your professor should immediately recognize that the quoted code is standard
regression input/output and that the Urkund results in this case are without
merit.
> On Sep 22, 2015, at 7:27 AM, BARRETT, Oliver wrote:
>
>
> Dear 'R' community support,
>
>
> I am a
> -Original Message-
> From: pda...@gmail.com
> Sent: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 11:41:19 +0200
> To: murdoch.dun...@gmail.com
> Subject: Re: [R] 'R' Software Output Plagiarism
>
>
> On 23 Sep 2015, at 02:33 , Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.dun...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
&
Marc,
I don't think Copyright/Intellectual property issues factor into this. Urkund
and similar tools are to my knowledge entirely about plagiarism. So the issue
would seem to be that the R output is considered identical or nearly indentical
to R output in other published orotherwise
Hi,
With the usual caveat that I Am Not A Lawyerand that I am not speaking on
behalf of any organization...
My guess is that they are claiming that the output of R, simply being copied
and pasted verbatim into your thesis constitutes the use of copyrighted output
from the software.
It is
Very good point about the referencing.
I wonder if this is happening to users of Stata or SAS as well?
John Kane
Kingston ON Canada
> -Original Message-
> From: marc_schwa...@me.com
> Sent: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 11:24:13 -0500
> To: bgunter.4...@gmail.com
> Subject: Re: [
e
Kingston ON Canada
> -Original Message-
> From: oliver.barr...@skema.edu
> Sent: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 14:27:03 +
> To: r-help@r-project.org
> Subject: [R] 'R' Software Output Plagiarism
>
>
> Dear 'R' community support,
>
>
> I am a student at Skema busin
Isn't plagiarism detection based on overlaps with sentence structure?
That way, it would catch plagiarism if someone simply did a
find-and-replace. But that would also catch regressions with the same
output format.
How long was the original thesis? If 25% of it was all regression
output, sounds
Peter,
Great distinction.
I was leaning in the direction that the "look and feel" of the output (standard
wording, table structure, column headings, significance stars and so forth in
the output) is similar to whatever Urkund is using as the basis for the
comparison and less so on an exact
Gunter; BARRETT, Oliver; R-help
Subject: Re: [R] 'R' Software Output Plagiarism
Peter,
Great distinction.
I was leaning in the direction that the "look and feel" of the output (standard
wording, table structure, column headings, significance stars and so forth in
the output) is similar to
On 22/09/2015 4:06 PM, peter dalgaard wrote:
> Marc,
>
> I don't think Copyright/Intellectual property issues factor into this. Urkund
> and similar tools are to my knowledge entirely about plagiarism. So the issue
> would seem to be that the R output is considered identical or nearly
>
Dear 'R' community support,
I am a student at Skema business school and I have recently submitted my MSc
thesis/dissertation. This has been passed on to an external plagiarism service
provider, Urkund, who have scanned my document and returned a plagiarism report
to my professor having
1. It is highly unlikely that we could be of help (unless someone else
has experienced this and knows what happened). You will have to
contact the Urkund people and ask them why their algorithms raised the
flags.
2. But of course, the regression methodology is not "your own" -- it's
just a
13 matches
Mail list logo