Thank you so much Robert. Please find the information below.
The scale 1-10 are subjective physical condition ratings scored by inspection
engineers at the site. 1-5 are in very bad conditions (bridge close down to
seriously deteriorated). The rest from 6-10 are categorized as good
At 01:29 PM 6/17/2007, adschai wrote:
Thank you so much Robert. Please find the information below.
The scale 1-10 are subjective physical condition ratings scored by
inspection engineers at the site. 1-5 are in very bad conditions
(bridge close down to seriously deteriorated). The rest from
Thank you so much Robert. I haven't thought about the idea of clumping
categories together. One of the reason is because these categories are bridge
condition rating scores. They indeed represent different meaning and
serviceability conditions. They vary from 0-9. I have about 300,000 data in
At 03:17 AM 6/16/2007, adschai wrote:
Thank you so much Robert. I haven't thought about the idea of
clumping categories together. One of the reason is because these
categories are bridge condition rating scores. They indeed represent
different meaning and serviceability conditions. They vary
Hi,
I have a model which tries to fit a set of data with 10-level ordered
responses. Somehow, in my data, the majority of the observations are from level
6-10 and leave only about 1-5% of total observations contributed to level 1-10.
As a result, my model tends to perform badly on points that
At 09:31 PM 6/15/2007, adschai wrote:
I have a model which tries to fit a set of data with 10-level
ordered responses. Somehow, in my data, the majority of the
observations are from level 6-10 and leave only about 1-5% of total
observations contributed to level 1-10. As a result, my model tends
