Re: [R] BUGS and OS X

2004-09-16 Thread Jari Oksanen
On Wed, 2004-09-15 at 21:29, Tamas K Papp wrote: On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 02:21:18PM -0400, Liaw, Andy wrote: That's more of a question for the BUGS developers. BUGS is not open source, so whatever binary is provided, that's all you can use. If I'm not mistaken, WinBUGS is the only version

Re: [R] BUGS and OS X

2004-09-16 Thread Anon.
Jari Oksanen wrote: On Wed, 2004-09-15 at 21:29, Tamas K Papp wrote: On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 02:21:18PM -0400, Liaw, Andy wrote: That's more of a question for the BUGS developers. BUGS is not open source, so whatever binary is provided, that's all you can use. If I'm not

Re: [R] BUGS and OS X

2004-09-16 Thread Martyn Plummer
On Wed, 2004-09-15 at 20:29, Tamas K Papp wrote: On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 02:21:18PM -0400, Liaw, Andy wrote: That's more of a question for the BUGS developers. BUGS is not open source, so whatever binary is provided, that's all you can use. If I'm not mistaken, WinBUGS is the only version

[R] BUGS and OS X

2004-09-15 Thread Tamas K Papp
Is there a way of running BUGS on OS X (from R)? I only see Windows versions on their website. If not, what are the alternatives for Bayesian analysis? Thanks, Tamas __ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help

Re: [R] BUGS and OS X

2004-09-15 Thread Tamas K Papp
On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 02:21:18PM -0400, Liaw, Andy wrote: That's more of a question for the BUGS developers. BUGS is not open source, so whatever binary is provided, that's all you can use. If I'm not mistaken, WinBUGS is the only version under development. I found something called JAGS,