]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ramon
Diaz-Uriarte
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 11:41 AM
To: Peter Dalgaard
Cc: r-help; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [R] eval(parse(text vs. get when accessing a function
On Friday 05 January 2007 19:21, Peter Dalgaard
; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [R] eval(parse(text vs. get when accessing a function
On Friday 05 January 2007 19:21, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
Ramon Diaz-Uriarte wrote:
Dear All,
I've read Thomas Lumley's fortune If the answer is parse() you
should usually rethink
] On Behalf Of Ramon
Diaz-Uriarte
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 11:41 AM
To: Peter Dalgaard
Cc: r-help; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [R] eval(parse(text vs. get when accessing a function
On Friday 05 January 2007 19:21, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
Ramon Diaz-Uriarte wrote:
Dear All
PROTECTED]
(801) 408-8111
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ramon
Diaz-Uriarte
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 11:41 AM
To: Peter Dalgaard
Cc: r-help; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [R] eval(parse(text vs
I agree with what you are saying. That is the reason I have What is the
problem you are trying to solve on my signature.
The other way of saying that is Tell me what you want to do, not how you
want to do it.
On 1/5/07, Thomas Lumley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, Ramon
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Ramon Diaz-Uriarte
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 10:02 AM
To: r-help; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [R] eval(parse(text vs. get when accessing a function
Dear All,
I've read Thomas Lumley's
:02 AM
To: r-help; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [R] eval(parse(text vs. get when accessing a function
Dear All,
I've read Thomas Lumley's fortune If the answer is parse() you should
usually
rethink the question.. But I am not sure it that also applies (and why)
to
other
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [R] eval(parse(text vs. get when accessing a function
On Friday 05 January 2007 19:21, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
Ramon Diaz-Uriarte wrote:
Dear All,
I've read Thomas Lumley's fortune If the answer is parse() you
should usually rethink the question.. But I
On 1/6/07, Thomas Lumley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, Ramon Diaz-Uriarte wrote:
I see, this is direct way of dealing with the problem. However, you first
need
to build the f list, and you might not know about that ahead of time. For
instance, if I build a function so
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ramon
Diaz-Uriarte
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 11:41 AM
To: Peter Dalgaard
Cc: r-help; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [R] eval(parse(text vs. get when accessing a function
On Friday 05 January 2007 19:21, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
Ramon
On Sat, 6 Jan 2007, Ramon Diaz-Uriarte wrote:
Dear Greg,
On 1/5/07, Greg Snow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ramon,
I prefer to use the list method for this type of thing, here are a couple of
reasons why (maybe you are more organized than me and would never do some of
the stupid things that
On 1/6/07, Brian Ripley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 6 Jan 2007, Ramon Diaz-Uriarte wrote:
(...)
cvFunct - function(whatever, genefiltertype, whateverelse) {
internalGeneSelect - eval(parse(text = paste(geneSelect,
genefiltertype, sep
Dear All,
I've read Thomas Lumley's fortune If the answer is parse() you should usually
rethink the question.. But I am not sure it that also applies (and why) to
other situations (Lumley's comment
http://tolstoy.newcastle.edu.au/R/help/05/02/12204.html
was in reply to accessing a list).
Ramon Diaz-Uriarte wrote:
Dear All,
I've read Thomas Lumley's fortune If the answer is parse() you should
usually
rethink the question.. But I am not sure it that also applies (and why) to
other situations (Lumley's comment
http://tolstoy.newcastle.edu.au/R/help/05/02/12204.html
was in
vs. get when accessing a function
Dear All,
I've read Thomas Lumley's fortune If the answer is parse() you should
usually
rethink the question.. But I am not sure it that also applies (and why) to
other situations (Lumley's comment
http://tolstoy.newcastle.edu.au/R/help/05/02/12204.html
On Friday 05 January 2007 19:21, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
Ramon Diaz-Uriarte wrote:
Dear All,
I've read Thomas Lumley's fortune If the answer is parse() you should
usually rethink the question.. But I am not sure it that also applies
(and why) to other situations (Lumley's comment
Statistics
South San Francisco, CA 94404
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ramon Diaz-Uriarte
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 10:02 AM
To: r-help; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [R] eval(parse(text vs. get when accessing a function
Dear All
]
Subject: [R] eval(parse(text vs. get when accessing a function
Dear All,
I've read Thomas Lumley's fortune If the answer is parse() you should
usually
rethink the question.. But I am not sure it that also applies (and why)
to
other situations (Lumley's comment
http
Cc: r-help; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [R] eval(parse(text vs. get when accessing a function
On Friday 05 January 2007 19:21, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
Ramon Diaz-Uriarte wrote:
Dear All,
I've read Thomas Lumley's fortune If the answer is parse() you
should usually rethink
Greg Snow wrote:
Personally I have never regretted trying not to underestimate my own future
stupidity.
Fortune!
__
R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide
Peter Dalgaard wrote:
Greg Snow wrote:
Personally I have never regretted trying not to underestimate my own future
stupidity.
Fortune!
Seconded.
__
R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, Ramon Diaz-Uriarte wrote:
I see, this is direct way of dealing with the problem. However, you first need
to build the f list, and you might not know about that ahead of time. For
instance, if I build a function so that the only thing that you need to do to
use my function
22 matches
Mail list logo
