Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN incoming checks fail due to non-staged installation

2019-03-26 Thread David Kepplinger
Thanks, Gábor, for taking the time to investigate the issue and the detailed elaboration! I resubmitted to CRAN with a brief explanation and a link to this thread. Thanks, David On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 2:55 PM Gábor Csárdi wrote: > OK, here is what I think is going on. > > There is a bug in the

Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN incoming checks fail due to non-staged installation

2019-03-26 Thread Gábor Csárdi
OK, here is what I think is going on. There is a bug in the check code, that creates a false positive when the package installation is performed with `--merge-multiarch`. In this case the x64 architecture uses a non-staged install, deliberately, but the check code still picks this up and reports i

Re: [R-pkg-devel] package cartograflow_0.0.0.9000.tar.gz

2019-03-26 Thread Henrik Bengtsson
FWIW, you should be able to reproduce at least the following NOTEs with your current R 3.5.2 and R CMD check --as-cran: * checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE Maintainer: ‘cartogRaflow ’ New submission Version contains large components (0.0.0.9000) Possibly mis-spelled words in DESCRIPTI

[R-pkg-devel] Re :Re: package cartograflow_0.0.0.9000.tar.gz

2019-03-26 Thread cartograf...@gmail.com
Hi,  l've made R CMD check --as-cran on rstudio 3.5.2Why I have to use r-devel? I confirm that I didn't received à error message when I've made dev_tool::check.  How can I solve my problem ? Thanks in advance Sylvain  nvoyé depuis Yahoo Mail pour Android Le lun., mars 25, 2019 à 23:38, Uwe

[R-pkg-devel] Version of make on CRAN Windows build machines

2019-03-26 Thread Winston Chang
On Windows I have a package that builds just fine with any recent version of Rtools. But on win-builder it fails because the version of GNU make on that machine does not support if-else syntax. Support for this syntax was added in GNU make 3.81, which was released in 2006. The version of Rtools on

Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN incoming checks fail due to non-staged installation

2019-03-26 Thread David Kepplinger
Dear Gábor, Oddly, it does emit a NOTE due to the non-staged install, as can be seen at https://win-builder.r-project.org/86i67mqTD9YY The package source can be found at https://github.com/dakep/pense-rpkg/tree/release/1.2.2 Thanks for your help, David On Tue, Mar 26, 2019, 3:28 AM Gábor Csárd

Re: [R-pkg-devel] GDAL which version on CRAN ?

2019-03-26 Thread Roger Bivand
Apologies for out-of-thread reply. The only feasible solutions are to maintain an off-CRAN (say drat) repository with binary packages you have built yourself, or use the existing CRAN infrastructure (rwinlib for Windows, etc., for which the rgdal, sf, gdalUtils, and other package maintainers a

Re: [R-pkg-devel] base::assign(".ptime", proc.time(), pos = "CheckExEnv")

2019-03-26 Thread Uwe Ligges
On 26.03.2019 10:12, Camford Oxbridge wrote: In my package, the error `base::assign(".ptime", proc.time(), pos = "CheckExEnv")` occurred. Not an error, this is part of the check scripts. Please report the full output of the check. Best, Uwe Ligges I cannot understand or fix it. What

[R-pkg-devel] base::assign(".ptime", proc.time(), pos = "CheckExEnv")

2019-03-26 Thread Camford Oxbridge
In my package, the error `base::assign(".ptime", proc.time(), pos = "CheckExEnv")` occurred. I cannot understand or fix it. What should I do ? [[alternative HTML version deleted]] __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.eth

Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN incoming checks fail due to non-staged installation

2019-03-26 Thread Gábor Csárdi
Hi David, if you only see install for i386 * installing *source* package 'pense' ... ** using staged installation [] install for x64 * installing *source* package 'pense' ... ** using non-staged installation [...] then everything is fine, there is no NOTE here, AFAICT. If you see a NOTE abo