On 30/11/2020 11:54 a.m., Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 30/11/2020 11:31 a.m., Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 30 November 2020 at 11:27, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
| I think that C++11 isn't a requirement of RcppArmadillo, it's an option
It is as of the 10.* series of Armadillo and hence RcppArmadillo 0.10
as pointed out to me the last time I was struggling with similar
issues, if (interactive()) { ... } is another potential solution
On 11/30/20 2:48 PM, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
The problem here was regarding user facing example():s, not package tests.
In order to keep a neat example for the us
The problem here was regarding user facing example():s, not package tests.
In order to keep a neat example for the user to play with, I'd
probably wrap the example code in a \donttest{} statement. Though, I
don't remember if CRAN tests with R CMD check --run-dontest, or not.
There's also \dontrun
Dear package development mailing list,
I am trying to publish my package httpgd (https://github.com/nx10/httpgd)
which includes Boost Beast to CRAN but I am struggling to solve a CMD check
warning:
* checking whether package 'httpgd' can be installed ... WARNING
Found the following significant wa
Don't test against a live website for most of your testing... use recorded or
simulated input. If your package functional interface doesn't allow for that,
then re-factor it so it does.
For those tests that actually have to interact with the live website, only run
them if you know you are not o
Dear all,
My package openSkies includes a set of functions to retrieve information from
the OpenSky API.
The examples for these functions can, on rare occassions, take anomously longer
times to complete than usually because of issues on the API side.
I have already included a timeout parameter
On 30 November 2020 at 11:54, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
| On 30/11/2020 11:31 a.m., Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| >
| > On 30 November 2020 at 11:27, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
| > | I think that C++11 isn't a requirement of RcppArmadillo, it's an option
| >
| > It is as of the 10.* series of Armadillo and
On 30/11/2020 11:31 a.m., Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 30 November 2020 at 11:27, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
| I think that C++11 isn't a requirement of RcppArmadillo, it's an option
It is as of the 10.* series of Armadillo and hence RcppArmadillo 0.10.*
I was going to complain that you should incl
On 30 November 2020 at 11:27, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
| I think that C++11 isn't a requirement of RcppArmadillo, it's an option
It is as of the 10.* series of Armadillo and hence RcppArmadillo 0.10.*
Dirk
--
https://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org
_
On 30 November 2020 at 17:06, Mark Clements wrote:
| [Apologies for cross-posting]
|
| A colleague uses a package I maintain (rstpm2) as a dependency in their
| package (rsimsum) with testing using GitHub Actions. They found that
| testing failed against R versions 3.3, 3.4 and 3.5 because recen
I think that C++11 isn't a requirement of RcppArmadillo, it's an option
that is used if available. (Assuming you are using the CRAN version,
not an experimental/devel version.) A user of the header file can include
#define ARMA_USE_CXX11
which would make it a system requirement of whatever p
[Apologies for cross-posting]
A colleague uses a package I maintain (rstpm2) as a dependency in their
package (rsimsum) with testing using GitHub Actions. They found that
testing failed against R versions 3.3, 3.4 and 3.5 because recent
versions of RcppArmadillo (which is a dependency in rstpm2)
12 matches
Mail list logo
