Thank you Dirk and Kevin,
that was very helpful and
> sudo apt install libc++-dev libc++abi-dev
did the job!
Great, this was very important to me.
Thanks again
Jens
On 13.09.20 02:55, Kevin Ushey wrote:
> My understanding is that many Linux OSes package the clang compiler, the
>
At least in the 'parallel' package
library(parallel)
cl = makePSOCKcluster(2)
and because of the nature of the R language, the entire namespace is exported,
analogous to
baz <- local({
foo <- function() 2
function(...) foo()
})
so making a package function baz available makes all
On 13.09.2020 21:22, David Kepplinger wrote:
Dear List-Members:
The email from the automatic incoming checks says to "reply-all" in case
one suspects a false-positive, yet the reply-to header is set only to "
cran-submissi...@r-project.org". My email program (just as myself)
interprets this
Thank you all for the discussion and suggestions.
so making a package function baz available makes all functions in the
> package available -- a function in the package already has access to other
> functions in the namespace, whether those functions are exported or not, so
> there is no need to
On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 3:19 PM Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>
> On 13/09/2020 3:51 p.m., David Kepplinger wrote:
> > Dear list members,
> >
> > I submitted an update for my package and got automatically rejected by the
> > incoming checks (as expected from my own checks) for using `:::` calls to
> >
Dear list members,
I submitted an update for my package and got automatically rejected by the
incoming checks (as expected from my own checks) for using `:::` calls to
access the package's namespace.
"There are ::: calls to the package's namespace in its code. A package
*almost* never needs to
On 13/09/2020 3:51 p.m., David Kepplinger wrote:
Dear list members,
I submitted an update for my package and got automatically rejected by the
incoming checks (as expected from my own checks) for using `:::` calls to
access the package's namespace.
"There are ::: calls to the package's
Dear List-Members:
The email from the automatic incoming checks says to "reply-all" in case
one suspects a false-positive, yet the reply-to header is set only to "
cran-submissi...@r-project.org". My email program (just as myself)
interprets this as "reply-all means replying only to
Apologize if I hijack this thread, but the use of ::: is something I was
puzzled.
I tried Duncan's solution in my R package mypkg, something like:
pkg::callInternal("foo", args)
R CMD check mypkg
* checking dependencies in R code ... WARNING
'::' or ':::' import not declared from: ‘pkg'
I
