Re: [R-pkg-devel] Package submission to CRAN not passing incoming checks

2024-04-23 Thread Ivan Krylov via R-package-devel
Dear Isaac, В Mon, 22 Apr 2024 17:00:27 + "Petersen, Isaac T" пишет: > This my first post--I read the posting guidelines, but my apologies > in advance if I make a mistake. Welcome to R-package-devel! You're doing just fine. > 1) The first note <...> includes the contents of the LICENSE

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Package submission to CRAN not passing incoming checks

2024-04-22 Thread Kasper Daniel Hansen
1. The version number complaint is the use of 0.1.2-9033. It is complaining about 9033. Personally, I would not use the - style, but that is a personal choice I guess. R-exts says "The mandatory ‘Version’ field gives the version of the package. This is a sequence of at least *two* (and

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Package submission to CRAN

2021-10-19 Thread Brodie Gaslam via R-package-devel
I would just increment the version.  This is the from the CRAN re-submission policy[1]: > Updates to previously-published packages must have an increased version. > Increasing the version number at each submission reduces confusion so is > preferred even when a previous submission was not

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Package Submission to CRAN

2020-11-17 Thread Akshit Achara
Dear Uwe, Thanks for the suggestions, I was able to install my package without the header files or library on the system. Thanks, Akshit Achara On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 8:02 PM Uwe Ligges wrote: > Write to c...@r-project.org, explain how to install the third party > software (availability

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Package Submission to CRAN

2020-11-14 Thread Uwe Ligges
Write to c...@r-project.org, explain how to install the third party software (availability and names of Debian packages etc.) and the CRAN team will decide whether the software will be isntalled on (a subset of) CRAN machines. Best, Uwe Ligges On 09.11.2020 19:24, Akshit Achara wrote: Hey