Dear all
I have done CCA in vegan on 41 response and 3 environmental variables , i
have taken this result:
Inertia Proportion
Total 5.8796 1.
Constrained 0.7079 0.1204
Unconstrained 5.1717 0.8796
how do interpate, is this analyse
Hai Mahnaz,
12% of the total Variance can be explained by the 3 constraining
environmental variables and 88% residual variance is left.
Cheers,
Eduard
On 18/10/16 09:51, Mahnaz Rabbaniha wrote:
> Dear all
>
> I have done CCA in vegan on 41 response and 3 environmental variables , i
> have ta
Hi all,
I am searching for a method to test weather a community is better predicted by
an other community or by the environment in a mantel-test like framework?
Any help would be appreciated. Platform preferably R.
All the best,
Franz
___
R-sig-ecolog
Do you know how to fix this error? It hapens when I try to get the raster
and convert do ASC (because it is a maxent demand)
>bio1 <- "D:/biorecortadobrasil/biobio1.tif"
>bio1
>stackbios <- stack(bio1) #stackeando os arquivos
>rasterstackbios <- raster(stackbios)
>agregrasterstackbios <- aggregate
Hello Franz,
One possibility would be to do ordinations (preferably NMDS) and then do a
Procrustes analysis. It is touted to be potentially more sensitive than a
mantel test and using the protest command, you can get a correlation statistic
and significance associated with the two datasets. The
