Re: [R-sig-Fedora] Fwd: Fedora 31 System-Wide change proposal: Automatic R runtime dependencies

2019-07-04 Thread Elliott Sales de Andrade
On Thu, 4 Jul 2019 at 06:05, José Abílio Matos wrote: > > On Thursday, 4 July 2019 10.35.18 WEST Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote: > > FYI, I plan on implementing this for F31 if no issues arise. > > Are there are any R packages, other than those built in R itself, that

[R-sig-Fedora] Fwd: Fedora 31 System-Wide change proposal: Automatic R runtime dependencies

2019-07-04 Thread Elliott Sales de Andrade
dependencies will not be automatically added, but can be opted in by the packager. == Owner == * Name: [[User:qulogic| Elliott Sales de Andrade]] * Email: quantum.anal...@gmail.com == Detailed Description == R libraries currently provide metadata indicating runtime requirements on other libraries

[R-sig-Fedora] Removing macros.R

2019-07-25 Thread Elliott Sales de Andrade
Hi, (This message is cross-posted to the Fedora devel and R SIG Fedora mailing lists.) Currently, R-core installs macros.R which defines one macro: %_R_make_search_index /usr/lib/rpm/R-make-search-index.sh This script does nothing, and there is no mention of this macro in our guidelines. The

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] R 4.0.0

2020-05-15 Thread Elliott Sales de Andrade
On Tue, 12 May 2020 at 12:13, Tom Callaway wrote: > > Okay, I'm convinced. > > https://github.com/rpm-software-management/R-rpm-macros/pull/1 > I merged the PR and pushed it to dist-git as well. I have not built anything though, since as I mentioned in the PR, I think builds should be done in a

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] Rebuild against FlexiBLAS

2020-08-11 Thread Elliott Sales de Andrade
Hi Iñaki, On Mon, 10 Aug 2020 at 08:24, Iñaki Ucar wrote: > > Hi, > > R has been built against FlexiBLAS in rawhide [1, 2]. These are the R > packages that need to be rebuilt: > > ... I noticed that R-sfsmisc is failing on koschei, and it appears to be related to this BLAS change:

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] R 4.0.0 rebuild status

2020-07-09 Thread Elliott Sales de Andrade
On Tue, 7 Jul 2020 at 09:58, José Abílio Matos wrote: > > On Tuesday, 7 July 2020 11.44.48 WEST Iñaki Ucar wrote: > > Try with the CLI (see "man bodhi"): > > > > $ bodhi updates edit --addbuilds > > I found that the best call in this case is instead of --addbuilds to use > --from-tag since then

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] R 4.0.0 rebuild status

2020-07-03 Thread Elliott Sales de Andrade
On Fri, 3 Jul 2020 at 13:03, José Abílio Matos wrote: > > On Monday, 29 June 2020 13.46.02 WEST Iñaki Ucar wrote: > > But the mass rebuild process is very different, because releng doesn't > > follow any particular order (they don't need to, because nothing > > really changed). > > > > The

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] R 4.0.0 rebuild status

2020-06-24 Thread Elliott Sales de Andrade
I could do so, but it wouldn't be until this weekend. Also, Tom mixed in some version bumps to the rebuild, so we'd have to check whether those would actually be okay in a released version. I would also appreciate some review on new (mostly test) dependencies for these bumps. On Tue, 23 Jun 2020

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] R 4.0.0 rebuild status

2020-06-25 Thread Elliott Sales de Andrade
On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 at 19:01, José Abílio Matos wrote: > > On Wednesday, 24 June 2020 10.42.10 WEST Iñaki Ucar wrote: > > Thanks, José and Elliott. I can help with reviews. > > > > I attach here a list of batches of CRAN packages to be rebuilt in > > order (batches separated by a blank line), and

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] R 4.0.0 rebuild status

2020-06-24 Thread Elliott Sales de Andrade
k - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839474 - R-DBItest > I attach here a list of batches of CRAN packages to be rebuilt in > order (batches separated by a blank line), and the script that > generates it. Hope it helps. > > Iñaki > > On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 at 11:35, Elliott Sales de And

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] R 4.0.0 rebuild status

2020-06-26 Thread Elliott Sales de Andrade
Hi José, On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 at 20:05, José Abílio Matos wrote: > > On Friday, 26 June 2020 00.45.46 WEST Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote: > > Thanks for starting off builds. However, please be careful merging to > > master, as some packages were bumped and have incompatibiliti

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] R 4.0.0 rebuild status

2020-07-27 Thread Elliott Sales de Andrade
On Tue, 21 Jul 2020 at 11:05, José Abílio Matos wrote: > > On Friday, 3 July 2020 18.36.17 WEST Iñaki Ucar wrote: > > Nice! What if we create a group "R" on Pagure and a repo > > "fedora-scripts" or something like that? > > I would like to improve the scripts but FWIW here it comes a rough

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] Plans for R 4.1 in Fedora?

2021-06-04 Thread Elliott Sales de Andrade
; >> ~spot >> >> On Fri, Jun 4, 2021, 3:57 PM Elliott Sales de Andrade >> wrote: >>> >>> On Fri., Jun. 4, 2021, 10:08 a.m. Tom Callaway, wrote: >>>> >>>> Is there a way to know which R components provide graphics drivers? I w

Re: [R-sig-Fedora] Plans for R 4.1 in Fedora?

2021-06-04 Thread Elliott Sales de Andrade
On Fri., Jun. 4, 2021, 10:08 a.m. Tom Callaway, wrote: > Is there a way to know which R components provide graphics drivers? I would > really rather not rebuild everything if we do not have to. > > Unless you mean rebuild for testing purposes, because you added the R(ABI) = major.minor