On Fri, 4 Jun 2021 at 16:08, Iñaki Ucar <iu...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > This seems like a good opportunity to give this a go: > https://github.com/juhp/fbrnch#parallel-building >
I did ask for some enhancements for bootstrap builds there, but I don't know how well it works yet. Also, I'm not too sure it understands our virtual Provides/BuildRequires, but if that is added, then it's a good choice for determining build order. > On Fri, 4 Jun 2021 at 21:59, Tom Callaway <spo...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> That is a very good point. Oh well. Anyone want to help generate the build >> order? :) >> >> ~spot >> >> On Fri, Jun 4, 2021, 3:57 PM Elliott Sales de Andrade >> <quantum.anal...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Fri., Jun. 4, 2021, 10:08 a.m. Tom Callaway, <spo...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Is there a way to know which R components provide graphics drivers? I would >>>> really rather not rebuild everything if we do not have to. >>>> >>> >>> Unless you mean rebuild for testing purposes, because you added the R(ABI) >>> = major.minor Provides/Requires, you need to rebuild the world anyway. >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ~spot >>>> >>>> On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 6:28 AM Iñaki Ucar <iu...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> > On Sat, 22 May 2021 at 22:18, José Abílio Matos <jama...@fc.up.pt> wrote: >>>> > > >>>> > > Hi all, >>>> > > what should be our plan for R 4.1 update in Fedora? >>>> > >>>> > See [1]. The plan is to wait for the next RStudio release and >>>> > coordinate updates. >>>> > >>>> > [1] https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-fedora/2021-May/000736.html >>>> > >>>> > > What are the pitfalls and the changes that we should be aware? >>>> > >>>> > The NEWS says: "The graphics engine version, R_GE_version, has been >>>> > bumped to 14 and so packages that provide graphics devices should be >>>> > reinstalled." But anyway, we should do the customary mass rebuild of >>>> > packages to avoid other possible incompatibilities and "Package was >>>> > built under version 4.0" messages. >>>> > >>>> > Iñaki >>>> > >>>> > > The second semester (with the corresponding induced pandemic chaos) >>>> > > is >>>> > > dimming down around here so I have at least time to breath again. :-) >>>> > > >>>> > > FWIW I am in no hurry to have 4.1 in Fedora 34, my main interest is >>>> > > to >>>> > have >>>> > > it in rawhide and later if we find it suitable to backport it to F34. >>>> > > >>>> > > FWIW since our last talk Octave (for version 7 at least) is starting >>>> > > by >>>> > > default to have the major version in the path for packages. :-) >>>> > > >>>> > > Best regards, >>>> > > -- >>>> > > José Abílio >>>> > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] >>>> > > >>>> > > _______________________________________________ >>>> > > R-SIG-Fedora mailing list >>>> > > R-SIG-Fedora@r-project.org >>>> > > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > -- >>>> > Iñaki Úcar >>>> > >>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>> > R-SIG-Fedora mailing list >>>> > R-SIG-Fedora@r-project.org >>>> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora >>>> > >>>> >>>> [[alternative HTML version deleted]] >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> R-SIG-Fedora mailing list >>>> R-SIG-Fedora@r-project.org >>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora > > > > -- > Iñaki Úcar -- Elliott _______________________________________________ R-SIG-Fedora mailing list R-SIG-Fedora@r-project.org https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora
