Ok, I think it's a bug and I'd like your help to confirm this. When the
x parameter (a raster stack in this case) of stackApply is quite heavy,
then the result of the stackApply is written to the disk and for some
reason the name indexes are shuffled. Conversely, when the provided
raster stack is
A description of the status now with regard to a prototype resolution is
online at:
https://rsbivand.github.io/ECS530_h19/ECS530_III.html
I'm planning to stream a talk about this at 09:15-11:00 CET on Tuesday 3
December. I need a volunteer to test the streaming link in advance during
next
