Simon,
> Hence this is a call to the R community to see if anyone actually cares.
I (and Chris Wild and quite a few of our mac users) care and would greatly
appreciate working GTK+ CRAN packages!
I don't have any knowledge re source etc, but just to remind you that the
current RGtk2 package
Patrick,
> On 4/04/2020, at 1:33 AM, Patrick Schratz wrote:
>
> Simon,
>
> thanks. I assume that you mean “clang from homebrew” = llvm (from homebrew)?
LLVM is the compiler infrastructure project, clang is the C/C++ compiler from
that project. We don't use any of the other compilers form
Simon,
I have tested an R-4.0.0 (i.e. R version 4.0.0 alpha (2020-04-01 r78130)
with my two packages (nleqslv and geigen) and all my private tests.
I have not found any problems with checking and testing these packages.
(I used Apple clang and Coudert's gfortran 8.2)
The only issue I have
For what it's worth, Homebrew and macports both have scripts for
installing GTK+ from sources, so presumedly those could be cribbed
into a standalone shell script for a build if desired:
https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-core/blob/master/Formula/gtk+.rb
> On 3 Apr 2020, at 13:25, Simon Urbanek wrote:
>
> Rainer,
>
>
>> On 3/04/2020, at 10:01 PM, Rainer M Krug wrote:
>>
>> Thanks a lot for your detailed response - it is very much appreciated.
>>
>>> On 2 Apr 2020, at 22:30, Simon Urbanek wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
On 2/04/2020, at 9:15
Simon,
thanks. I assume that you mean “clang from homebrew” = llvm (from homebrew)?
Indeed I am currently trying that out and it looks really robust for source
installations (more than the systems clang (+ eventual openMP flags like
suggested by Kevin) and other variants (gcc from homebrew or
Patrick,
you were commenting on the thread where we talked about CRAN R - that one is
now compiled using Apple clang. You were talking about using clang from
Homebrew - those are incompatible as they use different run-time.
Unfortunately, the Intel OpenMP run-time varies by clang compiler
Simon,
I don’t understand fully. I am using llvm for all C variants (just now shown)
in combination with the 10.13 SDK.
So far this combination works flawlessly for all “problematic” packages like
data.table, igraph or Rcpp.
I don’t have deeper knowledge about the “iomp” setup but as of right
Rainer,
> On 3/04/2020, at 10:01 PM, Rainer M Krug wrote:
>
> Thanks a lot for your detailed response - it is very much appreciated.
>
>> On 2 Apr 2020, at 22:30, Simon Urbanek wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 2/04/2020, at 9:15 PM, Patrick Schratz wrote:
>>>
>>> AFAIK most people on that list
Thanks a lot for your detailed response - it is very much appreciated.
> On 2 Apr 2020, at 22:30, Simon Urbanek wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 2/04/2020, at 9:15 PM, Patrick Schratz wrote:
>>
>> AFAIK most people on that list would vote hard against installing R via
>> homebrew for several reasons -
10 matches
Mail list logo
