It blows windows people away when they see the tip bar” (the bottom bar that
shows function parameters) display all the parameters for an obscure function.
It similarly dismays mac users when it shows something un-explainatory like
function_I_havent_used_for_ages(x, …) # i.e., … instead of the
(b) Are you seeing this both with Snow Leopard and Mavericks builds?
[Just] on 10.10 with 3.1.2-mavericks.pkg R.app GUI 1.65 (6833)
x86_64-apple-darwin13.4.0
Looks like it’s something with the Mavericks build. I’ll stick with
3.1.2-snowleapard.pkg for now.
Does anyone see a benefit (speed
Hi,
In R.app 3.2.0, doing
?function - index - vignettes - pdf
R.app requests a version of Adobe Reader. I don’t have this installed, but all
OS X users have preview.app
Could the help service be coded to either:
1. just open pdfs (that way they’ll be in a stand alone app configured by the
about Adobe until you
install some of their products at which point it's actually really hard to
reverse the changes their installers make.
Cheers,
Simon
On Aug 13, 2015, at 7:25 AM, Tim Bates timothy.c.ba...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
In R.app 3.2.0, doing
?function - index - vignettes
Hi,
A couple of minor suggestions for the mac GUI.
First, Help window back-forward buttons.
Often when the user has opened help, they want to navigate back a page.
Currently the back ( “ ) and forward ( “”) buttons in the help window lack
key bindings. So one has to use the mouse to navigate
this by trial and error so it might be worth documenting in the
OSX-FAQ document, although it seemed pretty intuitive and was the first thing
I tried after seeing this request. (It's how Firefox is configured.)
On Aug 15, 2015, at 6:22 AM, Tim Bates wrote:
A couple of minor suggestions for the mac
Half way through a week-long 130-person modelling workshop where all the
students are using R, and I am reminded how nice R.app is, but also of a couple
of niggles, which I thought I’d pass on.
1. The tab-completion drop-down doesn’t adjust it’s location to ensure the
bottom coordinate of the
Just got this warning from mac os
2016-12-08 13:43:40.610 R[36622:21934550] This application is trying to draw a
very large combo box, 43 points tall. Vertically resizable combo boxes are not
supported, but it happens that 10.4 and previous drew something that looked
kind of sort of okay.
Adrian is correct: the bug is that the font box is always disabled.
> On 3 Oct 2017, at 9:39 pm, Adrian Dușa wrote:
> I think the question is related to the font (in the lower half), not to the
> width / height / DPI in the upper half of the dialog.
> Just checked, and it
On R version: R version 3.4.2 (2017-09-28) (Platform:
x86_64-apple-darwin15.6.0, MacOS: 10.13.1)
load library(xkcd), and then try and run the vignette:
vignette("xkcd-intro")
*** caught illegal operation ***
address 0x7fff7429b5e2, cause 'illegal opcode'
Traceback:
1: system2(pdfviewer,
Simon very kindly wrote this function a couple of years ago when I noted how
nice it would be if pressing tab on an already-completed unique name would
write a $ sign and give a drop-down of $ elements.
I'd like to improve the function so that if the completion is a function name,
then
fyi
home$ sudo installer -pkg \
> /Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/Packages/macOS_SDK_headers_for_macOS_10.14.pkg
> \
> -target /
Password:
installer: Error - the package path specified was invalid:
'/Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/Packages/macOS_SDK_headers_for_macOS_10.14.pkg'.
R for R 4.0.2 GUI 1.72 Catalina build (7847)
Oops, I was going off muscle memory - I see that Quartz:Forward and Back are
set to "⌘ tab" and "⌘⇧ tab" (which can't do anything as they're captured by
the app switcher).
What are you seeing as the keys for Quartz:Forward and Quartz:Back?
Playing
provided the graphics
> window has focus, otherwise they switch virtual desktops (of course).
> -pd
>
>> On 5 Sep 2020, at 17:59 , Tim Bates wrote:
>> R for R 4.0.2 GUI 1.72 Catalina build (7847)
>> Oops, I was going off muscle memory - I see that
I wonder if this (2008/R 2.7) page could be updated with some current benchmark
runs?
Especially current Intel server chips, i9, and M1/+
I'm guessing if Simon could help upload the resulting updated page, people here
could contribute bench mark runs on different hardware.
Also be
15 matches
Mail list logo