On 04/04/2020 05:15, Tom Elliott wrote:
Simon,
Hence this is a call to the R community to see if anyone actually cares.
I (and Chris Wild and quite a few of our mac users) care and would greatly
appreciate working GTK+ CRAN packages!
I don't have any knowledge re source etc, but just to
Simon,
thanks. While this feels like a somewhat 1/1 discussion now, I also think that
others might profit from it.
1. I am aware that LLVM is a wrapper bundling more than just the compiler and
that it comes with its own copy of clang
2. I don’t use homebrew because it does not easily allow
If we have working 2.24.17 binaries, let's just use them. GTK+ was already
super mature by that point; it's unlikely that many improvements/fixes were
made. I'll start looking into RGtk3. Actually, I started that like 8 years
ago.
Michael
On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 9:43 AM Kevin Ushey wrote:
> For
Hi,
Porting this discussion about the future R 4.0 toolchain on GitHub Actions
(GHA) to the mailing list.
GHA will be the new standard regarding CI for the R community in the
foreseeable future since the tidyverse is moving there with full power and the
community usually follows.
Even leaving
You're right that the error originally reported in
https://github.com/rstudio/httpuv/issues/260 wasn't due to Rcpp. When I was
investigating the issue, I encountered a different error (the output of
which I posted to
https://gist.github.com/wch/c70b438381c9d2a8b1f917b054e0ba7e) which was
caused by
Thanks for the confirmation, Brian. I wasn't aware that Gtk+2 was abandoned for
so long - then our 2.24.17 binaries are in fact quite reasonable and I'll go
with that.
Thanks,
Simon
> On 4/04/2020, at 9:11 PM, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
>
> On 04/04/2020 05:15, Tom Elliott wrote:
>> Simon,
