Hello everyone,

I am comparing a categorical data vs. a continues data, but the continues
data is a frequency of an observed parameter. I'm considering using
phylogenetic ANOVA (Garland 1993) or PGLS for categorical data. But, I am
not sure with one is more appropriate to my data.


I would like to ask if someone have any advice about the subject, or can
recommend me a paper that compare these analyses.


All the best


- Carlos Bagolini-Jr

-- 
Carlos Biagolini-Jr.
Bacharel em Ci�ncias Biol�gicas - Universidade Federal de Lavras
Mestrando em  Diversidade Biol�gica e Conserva��o - Universidade Federal de
S�o Carlos
http://lattes.cnpq.br/4086237188108947

        [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

_______________________________________________
R-sig-phylo mailing list - R-sig-phylo@r-project.org
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-phylo
Searchable archive at http://www.mail-archive.com/r-sig-phylo@r-project.org/

Reply via email to