[racket-dev] Re: [racket-users] Re: Happy Module Day!

Well, the current "racket" repo is only a small part of what we distribute. You might try that same thing on the standard distribution. Robby On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 7:15 AM, Brian Adkins wrote: > On Friday, December 11, 2015 at 7:55:50 AM UTC-5, Brian Adkins wrote: >>

[racket-dev] Re: [racket-users] Re: Happy Module Day!

On Friday, December 11, 2015 at 8:17:39 AM UTC-5, Robby Findler wrote: > Well, the current "racket" repo is only a small part of what we > distribute. You might try that same thing on the standard > distribution. > > Robby Interesting. When I download the "Unix Source" from racket-lang.org, I

Re: [racket-dev] Re: [racket-users] Re: Happy Module Day!

Yes, that was the point (well, that and the point that something goes wrong with xargs). Brian: Sam and I don't agree on the facts. What I'm saying is "Racket's main distribution consistss of a lot of Racket-implemented goodies that, in many languages, would count as part of the compiler (and

[racket-dev] Re: [racket-users] Re: Happy Module Day!

> > FWIW, http://www.dwheeler.com/sloccount/ might be a better way to > accomplish this once it supports Racket detection. I just opened a feature > request for that at > https://sourceforge.net/p/sloccount/feature-requests/20/ and am hoping > there is interest. > You could also use sloc [1],