Let me just top-post my reply... :)
Although I am not sure how I could contribute to the list yet, I like
the idea. I am working on a commercial project in racket and would
certainly be happy to hear others thoughts on pragmatic business issues
like selling racket software, customer apprehension,
Hi,
I tried to disassemble this:
(define (f x y)
(if (and (zero? x)
(= (+ x y) y))
1
0))
In reality this is the same as:
(define (f x y)
(if (zero? x)
1
0))
Except racket does not perform the optimization. What's the reason for
this?
Kind regards,
--
Pau
On 15/03/18 07:23, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
>
> 1. Host it as a Google Groups non-archived email list, or as a somewhat
> more private MailMan email list at my vanity domain hoster? (In either
> case, Google already gives themselves permission to scrape individual
> GMail users' emails, there will
Hi,
Where can I find the scripts that generate the racket nightly builds?
I am having trouble generating something like the racket snapshots when
I build racket on my own.
For example, if I build in-place, the links.rkt file refers to files in
pkgs which was not inside the racket directory. This
On 06/04/18 16:28, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> See "INSTALL.txt" at the top of the git repo and skip down to "The
> Whole Enchilada: Building Installers".
>
Thanks. I was just going through the docs Robby referenced as well. The
whole point was an attempt to build racket versions, which I use for
te
Awesome. I can create a PR for this.
I will try to create the project myself and add you as a member of the
coverity project. Hopefully Synopsys will accept it.
I will keep you up-to-date.
On 14/09/2018 15:44, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> Hi Paulo,
>
> This sounds like an excellent project. I'm
On 14/09/2018 16:47, 'Paulo Matos' via Racket Developers wrote:
> Awesome. I can create a PR for this.
> I will try to create the project myself and add you as a member of the
> coverity project. Hopefully Synopsys will accept it.
>
> I will keep you up-to-date.
Hi,
I really like libgccjit. A lot of work has gone into it and it does a
really good job interfacing with gcc. That said, integrating it into
Racket is a _huge_ amount of work. It is nonetheless very interesting
and I would certainly like to see it done.
However, note Racket is moving to running
On 03/11/2018 20:15, Vibhav Pant wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Has there been any interest in using libgccjit as a JIT compilation
> library for Racket?
Vibhav, have you pursued any work in this direction?
--
Paulo Matos
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ra
On 05/11/2018 02:46, Gustavo Massaccesi wrote:
> In both cases, I think there will be a license problem. IIUC the license
> of libgccjit is GPLv3.
I am not a lawyer but Racket is LGPL. LGPL is GPL3 compatible. Am I
missing something?
--
Paulo Matos
--
You received this message because you a
On 06/02/2019 13:51, 'Paulo Matos' via Racket Developers wrote:
>
>
> On 05/11/2018 02:46, Gustavo Massaccesi wrote:
>> In both cases, I think there will be a license problem. IIUC the license
>> of libgccjit is GPLv3.
>
> I am not a lawyer but Racket i
FYI, I started some do some work on this:
https://github.com/LinkiTools/racket-gccjit
Not ready to be a proper pkg yet though. But it does already JIT an
hello world function (from libgccjit tutorial 1).
On 06/02/2019 13:37, 'Paulo Matos' via Racket Developers wrote:
>
>
>
Jay, this is great information, thanks.
I will make sure I will feature this in the next issue of RN.
On 28/03/2019 11:59, Jay McCarthy wrote:
> If you have been wanting to help improve Racket on ChezScheme, but
> didn't know where to start. I have a great resource for you...
>
> DrDr is now run
Hello,
Short Summary: I have added in 35d269c29 [1] cross architectural testing
using virtualized qemu machines. There are problems - we need to fix those.
Long Story:
For months now, I have been wishing I could get cross-arch testing done
on a regular basis on Racket. Initially I had something
stions and the poke. Now I am off to make racket
green again.
> [1]: https://github.com/racket/racket/commits/master
>
>> On Apr 2, 2019, at 02:59, 'Paulo Matos' via Racket Developers
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Short Summary: I have added in 35d
I have finished pushing the changes I have mentioned below.
Hopefully things will improve. Again, I am sorry for leaving Racket in
such a red state for the past couple of weeks. :)
On 10/04/2019 09:14, 'Paulo Matos' via Racket Developers wrote:
>
>
> On 09/04/2019 19:44
On 11/04/2019 11:01, jackhfi...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 10, 2019 at 12:15:02 AM UTC-7, Paulo Matos wrote:
>
> Currently I don't have enough machines or AWS time to dedicate to
> Racket builds
>
>
> How much do you need?
>
There are really two types of needs here.
- D
On 11/04/2019 11:56, Jack Firth wrote:
> So about 30-40 total cores for that second category?
That would be awesome! :)
> About how much
> total RAM is needed?
Someone might correct me here but from what I can see it would be great
to have something like 2G/core - but if not it shouldn't be
On 11/04/2019 15:32, 'Paulo Matos' via Racket Developers wrote:
>
> Thanks. I don't know much about kubernetes (still at the docker level...
> :)) but I saw the name thrown around in the gitlab docs so it should be
> fine integrating such a cluster with CI.
>
On 12/04/2019 07:45, Jack Rosenthal wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 at 15:32 +0200, 'Paulo Matos' via Racket
> Developers wrote:
>> No, currently I have a central cache for the gitlab machines
>> locally. However, I have in place an S3 bucket (Google would also
>
On 21/04/2019 17:44, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> The makefiles at https://github.com/racket/racket used to pull
> ChezScheme from https://github.com/mflatt/ChezScheme, but I've switched
> that to https://github.com/racket/ChezScheme (because it appears that
> Racket-specific patches will be need for
On 21/05/2019 20:40, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
> 'Joel Dueck' via Racket Developers wrote on 5/21/19 1:53 PM:]
>> The only downside I see is it would no longer be possible to post via
>> email.
>
> To whomever volunteers to do the implementation and the requirements
> analysis: please don't break em
On 20/05/2019 22:02, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> Can we please stop having posts about how the mailing list should work,
> unless that post contains the phrase "I volunteer"?
>
Kudos to this.
I am very happy about this strong message and wish it would come more
often from the senior team. There nee
Hi,
This is just to let you know of a GCC bug in GCC7.4.0 (default in Ubuntu
18.04 LTS) when compiling racketcs.
GCC complains about
vfasl.c:358:134: error: array subscript is above array bounds
[-Werror=array-bounds]
on vfasl.c of Chez sources. However, this is a false positive fixed on
more re
st out of curiosity.
Will let you know.
> At Wed, 5 Jun 2019 15:04:10 +0200, "'Paulo Matos' via Racket Developers"
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is just to let you know of a GCC bug in GCC7.4.0 (default in Ubuntu
>> 18.04 LTS) when compiling racketcs
On 05/06/2019 15:35, 'Paulo Matos' via Racket Developers wrote:
> Will let you know.
>
For those interested this party continues here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90758
--
Paulo Matos
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Hi,
I was looking at exploding the Racket CI configurations to make them
more fine-grained.
For non x86_64 architectures with default flags / racketcs etc, there
are many failures and I would like to make the testing more fine-grained
so that I can lock a configuration /to success/ as soon as pos
gt; doing that in other CI systems wasn't possible.
>
Now it is... :) What do you mean by a single full test run? All the
tests below, or running even further tests?
> Sam
>
> On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 3:49 PM 'Paulo Matos' via Racket Developers
> wrote:
>>
&g
Hi,
Just a heads-up that the mirror for Germany hasn't been updated with 7.3
and therefore choosing this mirror to download 7.3 results in a 404 [1].
Should the mirror list include a contact for the mirror?
[1] https://download.racket-lang.org/racket-7-3-x86_64-linux-sh.html
--
Paulo Matos
--
And I just noticed that it's the same for Canada and Belgium. Only USA
mirrors are working.
On 22/06/2019 19:34, 'Paulo Matos' via Racket Developers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just a heads-up that the mirror for Germany hasn't been updated with 7.3
> and therefore choo
30 matches
Mail list logo
