[[ Please switch to draft release. ]]
On Apr 2, 2015, at 3:03 PM, Daniel Bastos wrote:
Exercise 336
Solution. It's not a proper use. It produces nothing. It doesn't terminate.
Because (drop ls 0) returns a list not smaller than ls, hence the recursion
of bundle doesn't reach the
In DrRacket, is there any way to get the blue info box in the top-right corner
to show up for unfinished forms? As it is now, it only seems to show up once
the syntax checks. Which makes it basically useless as an aid to the beginner
writing code.
I *thought* it might be useful when I was
Jens Axel Søgaard jensa...@soegaard.net writes:
Tree?
Do you mean this?
http://docs.racket-lang.org/mrlib/Hierarchical_List_Control.html?q=button%25
Hmm, there is no screenshot, but it could be that's it. Thank you!
Sincerely,
Gour
--
When your intelligence has passed out of the dense
Hi Alexander D. Knauth
Thanks, for your very clear answers.
(require (rename-in racket (+ plus))) works too.
A silly mistake of mine to think define would do the same. It does not, of
course.
Your argument that a literal-id may occur more than once in a pattern makes
sense.
I'll play with
Here it is, although some of the things I did like creating objects on a
dummy panel and then reparenting them seem like they could be bad ideas.
https://github.com/AlexKnauth/racket-gui-table
Thanks, I've searched something like this for several days, starred. Maybe
would be a good idea
I left that out of the file so that it wouldn’t try to make a window
appear if I just run raco test on everything or something like that, or if
in the future I use Travis CI or something. But when I run the file in
DrRacket, I type in (send frame show #t) to check it. But even without
I never used syntax-parse before. I have to look into it.
Many thanks, of course,
Jos Koot
_
From: racket-users@googlegroups.com [mailto:racket-users@googlegroups.com]
On Behalf Of Alexander D. Knauth
Sent: domingo, 05 de abril de 2015 15:08
To: Jos Koot
Cc: racket-users@googlegroups.com
7 matches
Mail list logo
